The birthmark that matched a bullet wound

Among everything I have come across researching reincarnation evidence, one detail from Dr. Ian Stevenson's work has stayed with me more than almost any other. A Turkish boy named Süleyman Çaper was born with birthmarks on his ear. As he grew old enough to speak, he began describing a previous life, one that ended when a shotgun blast killed him. When Stevenson investigated the case, he found that the boy's birthmarks corresponded, entry and exit, to the exact wounds documented from that shotgun death.

Stevenson spent nearly fifty years as a University of Virginia psychiatrist documenting cases like this one, and by 1997 he had compiled 210 cases where a child's birthmark or birth defect matched a fatal wound described in a remembered previous life. In 49 of those cases, he obtained actual autopsy or medical records, documentation created before anyone had ever connected that death to a living child, and compared them directly against the birthmark years later.

That order of events matters more than it might seem to at first. The record of the wound existed first, entirely separate from any child. Only afterward did Stevenson bring the two pieces of evidence together. That sequence rules out one of the easiest explanations skeptics reach for, the idea that a family shapes a story backward to fit a birthmark that was already there. In these particular cases, the wound was documented before the birthmark was ever compared to it.

I think about what a birthmark actually is, medically. It is not something a toddler can be coached into producing, or something a hopeful family can manufacture after the fact. It is either present, in the corresponding location, matching a real documented wound, or it is not. That is part of why I find this particular thread of Stevenson's research so hard to dismiss as simple coincidence or cultural storytelling.

Stevenson was careful never to claim that any single case proved reincarnation outright. He argued something more precise: that in his strongest documented cases, reincarnation was the best available explanation for evidence that was otherwise very difficult to account for. A birthmark matched against an autopsy report, tied to a name, a town, and a death a small child could not plausibly have learned about any other way.

If you have ever wondered whether something of who we were might carry forward into who we become next, I think this is worth sitting with. Not as proof, but as evidence patient enough, and careful enough, that it took a rigorous, skeptical scientist most of his working life to fully document.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next. 

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞