The doctor who coined "near-death experience": Dr. Raymond Moody's decades of research

I want to introduce you to the man who gave us the very term we now use without thinking twice about it. Near-death experience. Before 1975, that phrase did not exist in the medical or scientific vocabulary. People had these experiences, of course, they always have, but there was no shared language for them, no framework for taking them seriously, and certainly no doctor willing to stake his career on studying them. Then Dr. Raymond Moody wrote a book called Life After Life, and everything changed.

I have spent the past several weeks moving between mystics and scientists in this research, from Edgar Cayce's trance readings to Emanuel Swedenborg's visionary theology, and I find Moody's work sits in an interesting place between the two. He was trained as a philosopher and later became a medical doctor, and he approached the subject the way a researcher approaches any phenomenon, by collecting cases, looking for patterns, and reporting what he found without forcing it into a predetermined shape. What he found, across hundreds of interviews, was a pattern so consistent that it gave the entire field of near-death studies its first real foothold in the scientific world.

How Moody's research began

Moody's interest started, as so much of the best research does, with a chance encounter. As a philosophy student, he met a psychiatrist who described his own experience of clinical death and revival, and the account stunned him. He began asking around, quietly at first, and kept finding more people with strikingly similar stories to tell, people who had been pronounced dead or came close to it, then revived, carrying with them a memory of something that had happened in between.

By the time he entered medical school, he had accumulated enough cases that he decided to study them formally. His 1975 book Life After Life was based on interviews with roughly 150 people who had come close to death or been resuscitated after cardiac arrest. He was careful, even in that first book, not to claim he had proven an afterlife exists. What he claimed was more modest and, I think, more powerful. He claimed a pattern existed, one so consistent across people who had never spoken to each other, come from different backgrounds, different religions, different parts of the country, that it demanded serious attention.

It is worth remembering just how unusual this made him at the time. In the mid-1970s, mainstream medicine had almost nothing to say about the subjective experience of dying. Death was treated as a biological event to be managed or prevented, not something with a phenomenology worth documenting. Moody was, in a real sense, inventing a category. He needed language that did not yet exist to describe what his interview subjects kept independently reporting, and the term he settled on, near-death experience, was deliberately clinical and neutral. He wanted a term sturdy enough to hold up under scientific scrutiny, not one that presumed a religious or spiritual conclusion before the research had even begun.

The pattern Moody found

What Moody identified became known as the core near-death experience, and it is worth walking through because so much of what I have found in my research on other traditions, including Cayce's readings and Swedenborg's visions, echoes pieces of this same pattern.

People described a sense of leaving the physical body, often watching their own resuscitation or the scene around them from somewhere outside it, with a strange calm rather than panic. Many described moving through a dark space, often described as a tunnel, toward a light that grew brighter as they approached, a light that was not blinding or harsh but warm, and somehow alive with love and understanding. Along the way or upon arrival, many reported being met by deceased relatives or friends, sometimes by a being of light they associated with the divine, though they often struggled to name exactly what that being was.

Then came something Moody documented carefully and which shows up again and again across the other research I have gathered, a life review. People described watching their life play out again, not simply as memory but as a full re-experience, often including how their actions affected others, the same texture I found in Cayce's readings and, in a different form, in Swedenborg's descriptions of the soul settling into what it had truly become. At some point, most people reported reaching what felt like a boundary or a limit, a sense that if they went further they would not be able to return, and they were then, often reluctantly, sent or drawn back into their bodies.

I find it remarkable that a philosophy student turned doctor, working entirely independently, documenting cases from ordinary Americans in the 1970s with no exposure to Cayce's readings or Swedenborg's centuries-old theology, arrived at a description of dying that overlaps so closely with both. That kind of convergence, from completely unrelated sources, is exactly the kind of evidence that keeps pulling me deeper into this research.

I also want to note something Moody himself emphasized, which is that not every experience contained every element of this pattern, and the order in which elements appeared could vary. Some people described only the tunnel and the light. Others skipped the tunnel entirely and moved straight to an encounter with a deceased loved one. A smaller number described a far more difficult, even frightening version of the experience, something later researchers would study in its own right. Moody was careful not to flatten these accounts into a single rigid script. What he documented was a common shape, not an identical experience repeated word for word, and that honesty about the variation is part of what makes the underlying pattern so credible. Real phenomena tend to show natural variation around a common core. A fabricated or copied story tends to look identical every time.

Moody was cautious, and that caution matters

One thing I want to highlight, because I think it actually strengthens rather than weakens his work, is how careful Moody was about his claims. He never stated that near-death experiences proved life after death in a scientific sense. He was explicit that he could not rule out physiological explanations entirely, and he presented his findings as an invitation for further study rather than a final answer.

This caution is part of why his work held up. A researcher who overclaims tends to get dismissed quickly by the broader scientific community. Moody's restraint, his willingness to say "here is a consistent pattern, and here is what it might mean, but I cannot prove its ultimate cause," is part of what allowed near-death experience research to grow into a legitimate field of study rather than being written off entirely. Decades later, researchers like Bruce Greyson, Pim van Lommel, and Sam Parnia would build directly on the foundation Moody laid, using increasingly rigorous methods, and none of that would have been possible without a first researcher willing to take these accounts seriously enough to document them properly.

It is also worth noting that Moody faced real professional risk in publishing Life After Life at all. He was a young physician at the start of his career, entering a field where reputations are built on caution and peer consensus, choosing to publish a popular book about a subject most of his colleagues considered, at best, a curiosity unworthy of serious study. Some of his peers were openly skeptical, and a few dismissed the work outright as unscientific storytelling dressed up in medical credentials. That reaction, uncomfortable as it must have been, is actually a sign of a field working as it should. New claims are supposed to face resistance. What matters is what happens over the following decades, and in this case, the resistance gave way to an entire discipline of near-death studies, with dedicated academic journals, university research divisions, and physicians willing to build their careers on the same questions Moody first raised.

What near-death experiencers say changed in them afterward

One part of Moody's research that I find especially meaningful, and that comes up constantly in later studies too, is what happens to people after a near-death experience. This is not simply a strange story they carry for the rest of their lives. It fundamentally reorganizes how they live.

People who go through this experience consistently report a dramatically reduced fear of death. Many describe a shift toward valuing love and knowledge above material success or status, a sense that connection with others matters more than anything they previously prioritized. Many also describe a new appreciation for ordinary life, a heightened aliveness to small moments they might have previously rushed past. This is not a fringe reaction reported by a handful of unusual people. It shows up consistently enough across Moody's interviews, and across the decades of research that followed him, that researchers consider it one of the most reliable markers of a genuine near-death experience.

I think this pattern of change deserves more attention than it usually gets, because it is arguably the most testable part of the whole phenomenon. We cannot independently verify what someone experienced while clinically unconscious. But we can absolutely observe and measure how a person's values, relationships, and behavior change afterward, and researchers have done exactly that, using standardized psychological assessments before and after these experiences whenever possible. The changes are not subtle or easily explained away as simple relief at having survived. People who nearly die from a car accident without a near-death experience do not show this same consistent values shift. It appears specifically tied to the experience itself, not simply to the brush with mortality.

I think about what this means for anyone who has had one of these experiences themselves, or who is caring for someone who has. The change is not a psychological quirk to be explained away. It is, according to everything Moody and those who followed him documented, one of the most consistent and well-documented effects of coming close to death and returning. Something real happens to people in that space, real enough to permanently reshape how they live afterward.

Why I find Moody's work such an important piece of this puzzle

I want to be honest about something I have come to appreciate more with each new source I study in this research. No single account, whether it comes from a trance medium, an eighteenth-century mystic, or a philosopher turned doctor interviewing cardiac arrest survivors, proves anything on its own. Each one is a single thread. What convinces me, increasingly, is the way these threads keep braiding together into the same underlying shape.

Cayce's readings described a soul gently separating from the body, moving through stages of expanded awareness, encountering loved ones, undergoing a compassionate life review, and eventually choosing its next step. Swedenborg described a similar release from the body, a gradual settling into one's true nature, encounters with beings who had once been human, and a structure to the afterlife built around love rather than judgment. Now Moody, working from a completely different discipline and drawing on completely different sources, hundreds of ordinary people describing their own experiences of coming close to death, arrives at strikingly the same landmarks. A separation from the body. A being of light. A life review built on understanding rather than punishment. A reluctant return.

I do not think this is coincidence, and I do not think it needs to be treated as competing claims where only one source can be right. I think it is closer to several witnesses independently describing the same terrain, each limited by their own vantage point and language, but converging on the same underlying reality. A trance medium in Virginia Beach. A Swedish scientist in the 1700s. A philosophy student turned doctor interviewing patients in Georgia hospitals in the 1970s. None of them were talking to each other, and yet the picture they paint keeps rhyming.

Where the research went from here

Moody's work opened a door that has stayed open for fifty years now. The International Association for Near-Death Studies grew directly out of the interest his book generated, and it remains an active hub for both researchers and people who have had these experiences themselves. Researchers like Bruce Greyson developed formal scales for measuring and classifying near-death experiences, moving the field toward increasingly rigorous methodology. Cardiologists and critical care physicians, people like Pim van Lommel and Sam Parnia, began running prospective studies in hospital settings, tracking cardiac arrest survivors in real time rather than relying on retrospective interviews alone. I will be writing about several of these researchers in the weeks ahead, because each one builds on the foundation Moody laid, pushing the methodology further while continuing to find the same essential pattern he first documented.

This progression matters because it answers the most common objection people raise about this research, the idea that it all rests on unreliable memory and storytelling with nothing to actually check it against. That objection had real force in 1975. It has far less force today. Later researchers built studies designed specifically to test whether reported perceptions during cardiac arrest could be independently verified, placing hidden visual targets in hospital rooms, monitoring brain activity with far more precision than was available in Moody's era, and tracking outcomes prospectively rather than relying on people to volunteer their stories after the fact. The field grew up, methodologically speaking, and in every case I have found so far, growing up did not make the phenomenon disappear. It made the pattern harder to dismiss.

What strikes me most, looking back at where this field started, is that it began with one person deciding an experience was worth taking seriously simply because so many people, independently, kept describing the same thing. That is not so different from what happens in a reading, actually. A pattern emerges, consistent and specific enough that it becomes impossible to dismiss as coincidence. Moody just happened to be documenting that pattern across hundreds of separate lives instead of one at a time.

If you have had a near-death experience yourself, or if someone you love has described one to you, I hope this offers some validation. What you experienced, or what they described to you, fits into one of the most well-documented and carefully studied patterns in this entire field of research. You are not alone in it, and you never were.

I also think there is something worth sitting with here if you have never had one of these experiences yourself, and are simply grieving someone who has died. So much of what Moody documented describes the earliest moments after death, the calm, the light, the reunion, the life review held with understanding rather than judgment. If even a fraction of what hundreds of independent witnesses described to him holds true, then whatever fear you carry about what your loved one experienced in their final moment can likely be set down. The overwhelming pattern, across every source I have researched so far, describes something closer to relief and welcome than confusion or distress. That will not undo your grief. But I hope it can sit alongside it, quietly, as something steadying.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

Heaven and hell aren't places, according to Swedenborg

Most of us grew up picturing heaven and hell as destinations, somewhere a soul gets sent after a kind of cosmic verdict. In my research into Emanuel Swedenborg's writings, a Swedish scientist who claimed daily visits to the afterlife for the final twenty-seven years of his life, I found something quite different, and I think it is worth sharing.

According to Swedenborg, heaven and hell are not places assigned to a soul by some outside judge. They are expressions of who that soul has actually become. A person oriented toward genuine love and care for others naturally settles into the state we call heaven. A person oriented toward love of self, toward using others for personal gain, naturally settles into what we call hell. Nobody is sentenced. Souls simply gravitate toward the company and the state that matches what they already love most, the same way water finds its own level.

I find this reframe strangely comforting, especially for anyone carrying old fear about a punishing God waiting to catch them in a mistake. There is no punisher in this picture. There is only a kind of natural law, one built entirely around what a person spent their life actually loving, underneath all their flaws and mistakes along the way.

Swedenborg also describes a gentle, gradual process that happens right after death, before a soul settles anywhere permanent. He calls it the world of spirits, a kind of threshold period where the outer self a person maintained during earthly life, the version shaped by social expectation and the pressure to manage how others saw them, slowly falls away. What is left, eventually, is simply the truth of who that person always was underneath it all.

I think about how much of life here is spent managing impressions, softening our real feelings, presenting a version of ourselves calibrated to what others expect of us. Swedenborg's writing suggests none of that survives death. There is nowhere left to hide, but there is also nothing left to perform. A soul finally just gets to be exactly who it is, fully and without apology.

If you have ever worried about how your own life will be judged when it ends, or wondered whether someone you loved, despite their flaws, ended up somewhere good, I hope this offers something gentler to hold onto. According to Swedenborg, nobody sends you anywhere. You simply become, more fully than ever, whoever you already were choosing to love.

Continue reading?

You might also enjoy What an 18th-Century Scientist Saw in Heaven: Emanuel Swedenborg's Vision of the Afterlife, where I go deeper into his full account, including what he says happens to marriage, love, and the people we lose.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

What an 18th-century scientist saw in heaven: Emanuel Swedenborg's vision of the afterlife

I want to introduce you to someone whose work has been sitting quietly behind a lot of what I write about, even before I started this Edgar Cayce research. His name was Emanuel Swedenborg, and if you have never heard of him, you are far from alone. But once you know his story, I think you will understand why so many serious thinkers, scientists, and writers over the last two hundred and fifty years have taken him seriously, even when his claims sound almost too strange to believe.

Swedenborg was born in Stockholm in 1688, into a devoutly religious family, and he spent the first half of his life as one of the most respected scientists in Europe. He was an inventor, an engineer, an anatomist, a mining expert given a seat among Swedish nobility by the crown. This was not a fringe figure or a wandering mystic with no credibility to lose. This was a man of rigorous, established scientific standing, the kind of person you would least expect to spend the last twenty-seven years of his life claiming daily conversations with angels.

But that is exactly what happened. At the age of fifty-six, Swedenborg entered what he described as a spiritual awakening, a period of intense dreams and visions that culminated in what he believed was direct contact with the divine. From that point in 1745 until his death in 1772, he claimed his eyes had been opened to freely visit heaven and hell, to speak with angels, spirits, and the souls of people he had known and people he never had, and to bring back detailed reports of what he found there. He wrote it all down, meticulously, the same careful documentation you would expect from the scientist he had always been. His most famous work, Heaven and Hell, remains in print today, nearly three hundred years later, and its influence has reached figures as varied as the poet William Blake, the philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson, and the writer Jorge Luis Borges.

I find myself drawn back to Swedenborg's work again and again in my own research, because so much of what he described lines up with what I have come to understand through years of mediumship, and with what shows up again and again across other traditions I have studied, including Cayce's readings. When multiple sources this different from each other, separated by centuries and continents and completely different starting points, keep describing the same underlying shape of the afterlife, I think that convergence is worth paying attention to.

It also helps to understand a little about how Swedenborg himself described these experiences, because it was not passive dreaming or vague impressions. He wrote that he was fully conscious during these visits, walking through spiritual landscapes and holding conversations the same way he might describe walking through a garden and talking with a friend. He kept a spiritual diary for decades, recording what he saw and heard in careful, dated entries. Whatever you make of his claims, the sheer discipline and consistency of the record he left behind is unusual. This was not a man prone to embellishment. It was a scientist, applying the same rigor to the afterlife that he had once applied to anatomy and engineering.

Heaven and hell are not places you get sent

The first thing that struck me reading Swedenborg's work is how differently he frames the whole concept of heaven and hell. We tend to think of them as destinations, places assigned to us after some kind of judgment, the way a court might assign a sentence. Swedenborg describes something far more intimate than that, and honestly, far more just.

According to his writings, heaven and hell are not verdicts handed down by an external authority. They are expressions of who a person has actually become over the course of their life. Someone oriented toward love, toward genuine care for others, toward what Swedenborg calls "the good of the neighbor," naturally gravitates toward the company and the state of being that we call heaven. Someone oriented instead toward the love of self, toward using others for their own gain, naturally gravitates toward what we call hell. Nobody is sent anywhere. Souls sort themselves, drawn by the pull of what they already love most.

I think this reframe matters enormously, especially for anyone carrying old fears about a punishing God waiting to catch them in a mistake. Swedenborg's vision removes the punisher from the picture entirely. What replaces it is something closer to natural law. You become what you love, and after death, you simply continue being that, in the company of others who share it.

I think about how often this shows up in the fears people bring to me in readings, the quiet worry that a loved one's flaws, their temper, their mistakes, their unfinished growth, might have counted against them in some final tally. Swedenborg's framework offers something gentler than a tally. It suggests that what actually determines someone's experience after death is not a record of individual failures weighed against successes, but the deeper orientation of their heart, the thing they spent their life actually loving most, underneath all the mistakes along the way. A person who loved genuinely, even imperfectly, even with real flaws, still gravitates toward that same natural state of warmth and connection. The imperfection does not disqualify the love.

The soul does not change instantly at death

One detail from Swedenborg's writings that I find especially moving is his description of what happens in the earliest period after death, a stage he calls the world of spirits. This is not heaven, and it is not hell. It is something closer to a threshold, a middle realm where the soul spends time adjusting before it moves on to wherever it will ultimately settle.

During this period, Swedenborg describes the soul gradually shedding the outer self it maintained during physical life, the version of itself shaped by social expectation, by the need to manage how others perceived it. Bit by bit, what remains is the soul's true underlying character, the part that was always there beneath the performance of daily life. This process is not sudden. It unfolds gradually, gently, giving the soul time to recognize and settle into who it actually is, free of the pressures that shaped its outer behavior while alive.

I think about how much of our lives here are spent managing impressions, softening our real feelings, presenting a version of ourselves calibrated to what other people expect. Swedenborg's description suggests that none of that survives death. What is left, eventually, is simply the truth of who you were underneath it all. For some people that might be an uncomfortable thought. But I find it strangely relieving. There is nowhere left to hide, but there is also nothing left to perform. You finally just get to be exactly who you are.

This also offers something I think is worth sitting with if you are grieving someone whose final years were marked by illness, confusion, or a personality that seemed to change under the weight of suffering. Swedenborg's description suggests that whatever surface distortions physical decline or hardship placed over a person's true nature, none of that is permanent. The world of spirits is where those layers fall away. What emerges afterward is not the confused or diminished version you may have witnessed at the end, but the person's actual, underlying self, restored and whole.

Angels were once people like us

One detail that surprised me most in this research is Swedenborg's insistence that angels are not a separate category of being, created differently from humans and stationed above us in some cosmic hierarchy. According to his writings, every angel was once a human being who lived an earthly life and, through the natural sorting process described above, settled into heaven after death. There is no separate species of angel. There is only us, at different points along the same continuum.

This connects to something I hear constantly from clients, the hope that a parent, a spouse, a child who has passed might in some sense still be watching over them, guiding them, present in a way that feels almost angelic. Swedenborg's framework suggests that hope is not naive. If angels are simply souls who have settled fully into love, then the people we lost, if they lived with real love and care, are not so far from that description themselves. The line between "someone I loved" and "an angel" turns out to be much thinner than we usually imagine.

I should say, in fairness, that Swedenborg had critics in his own time and has them still. Some of his contemporaries dismissed his visions outright, and modern skeptics point out that there is no way to verify any of it against physical evidence, the same limitation that applies to most firsthand spiritual testimony. I don't think that skepticism should be dismissed. It is a reasonable response to an extraordinary claim. But I also think it is worth noticing that a man with everything to lose professionally, a respected scientist with a reputation built over decades, chose to spend the last third of his life documenting these experiences anyway, in careful, methodical detail, at real risk to how history would remember him. That choice does not prove his visions were real. But it does suggest he believed, with total conviction, that they were.

The structure of heaven itself

Swedenborg's descriptions of heaven itself are remarkably detailed, more detailed than almost any other account I have come across in this research. He describes heaven as organized not by geography the way we understand it, but by what he calls correspondence, meaning the outer form of heaven mirrors the inner spiritual state of the souls who inhabit it. Communities form around shared loves and shared understanding. Souls with similar inner natures are drawn together, not by force, but by the same natural gravity that shapes everything else in this framework.

He also describes heaven as tiered, not in a hierarchy of reward but in something closer to depth of understanding and capacity for love. Some souls exist in what he calls the celestial heaven, closest to direct, intuitive love of the divine. Others exist in the spiritual heaven, understanding truth more through reason and conscious insight. Both are described as complete and joyful in their own right. Neither is lesser. They are simply different expressions of the same underlying reality, suited to the particular soul experiencing them.

What I appreciate about this structure is how it avoids the trap so many afterlife descriptions fall into, the idea that heaven is a single uniform reward handed out equally to everyone regardless of who they actually are. Swedenborg's heaven adapts to the soul, rather than asking the soul to conform to some fixed, generic version of paradise. It sounds, in a strange way, like the most personalized experience imaginable, tailored exactly to who you have become.

He goes even further, describing entire communities within heaven organized around particular kinds of usefulness and love, the way a person who spent their life caring for others might find themselves among a community centered on that same nurturing quality, while someone whose love expressed itself through wisdom or teaching might settle among others oriented the same way. Nothing here is wasted or set aside. The particular shape of a person's love in life becomes, in Swedenborg's afterlife, the very thing that places them exactly where they belong.

Marriage and love continue

One of the more tender details in Swedenborg's writings concerns what happens to deep romantic love after death. He describes something he calls conjugial love, a union between two souls so complete that it continues, and can even deepen, in the afterlife. Not every earthly marriage qualifies, in his framework. He is specific that this describes a true spiritual union between two people whose inner natures are genuinely matched, rather than simply a legal or social arrangement. But when that kind of bond exists, Swedenborg suggests it does not end with death. It continues, and grows.

I think about how often people ask me, in readings, whether they will be reunited with a spouse they lost, whether that particular love, the one that shaped so much of their life, still exists somewhere. Swedenborg's answer, if his visions are to be trusted, is a clear yes, with the added suggestion that the truest version of that love might only become more fully itself once free of the practical burdens and misunderstandings that so often complicate love here on earth.

I find this detail especially meaningful for anyone who lost a spouse after decades together, the kind of bond that outlasted illness, hardship, the ordinary friction of a long shared life. Swedenborg's writing suggests that everything that made that bond real, the loyalty, the tenderness, the particular way two people came to understand each other over the years, is not lost with the body. If anything, it is finally unburdened, free to exist without the practical weight that so often gets tangled up with love while both people are still living in the physical world. What remains, in his description, is love in its purest and most complete form.

Why this matters alongside everything else I have researched

I want to be honest about something. Swedenborg's theology is enormous and complex, built over decades and spanning dozens of volumes, and I am only able to touch the surface of it here. He was also, without question, a man of his particular time and culture, and some of his framing reflects the religious language of eighteenth-century Christianity in ways that will not resonate with every reader equally.But what keeps bringing me back to his work is the underlying shape of what he describes. A soul that continues after death, unforced into a fixed fate, but naturally settling into the state its own love has already built. A period of gentle adjustment after death rather than instant, jarring judgment. Relationships and love that continue rather than dissolve. Angels who are simply us, further along. None of that is unique to Swedenborg alone. I have found variations of every one of these ideas across Cayce's readings, and I expect I will keep finding them as I continue researching other mystics, mediums, and even scientific researchers who have taken death seriously enough to study it closely.

I think that pattern, showing up again across sources with nothing else in common, is itself a kind of evidence. Not proof, in the way a laboratory experiment might offer proof, but something quieter and, to me, just as meaningful. A consistency that suggests these accounts might be pointing toward something real, glimpsed from different angles by people separated by centuries, culture, and belief, who nonetheless keep describing the same underlying truth about what waits for us. Love continues. Growth continues. And nothing about who you truly are is lost.

Ready to experience a reading?

If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to walk that path with you. You can book a mediumship reading at aperfectsoul.com.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

The reunion that waits on the other side

There is a stage in Edgar Cayce's readings on the soul's journey after death that I think about often, especially when I am sitting with someone who lost a person before they got the chance to fully make peace with them. It comes after the soul has released from the body, expanded into a fuller awareness, and moved through the honest, compassionate review of the life it just lived. Once all of that has happened, the soul is reunited.

According to these readings, this reunion brings together loved ones who crossed before, familiar souls from other points in the soul's journey, and spiritual guides who have been present all along. What stands out to me most is how the communication happens at this stage. Not through spoken words, but through direct thought and shared understanding. I think that detail matters more than it might seem to at first. So much pain between people here comes from words chosen poorly in a hard moment, or a tone that got misread, or something important that never got said in time. In this kind of communication, none of that is possible. There is no misunderstanding to untangle. Just complete understanding, shared directly, soul to soul.

These reunions are described as bringing real healing and reconciliation, not just comfort. If there was distance or hurt between two people in life, this stage offers actual repair of it, not a surface level reassurance but something closer to full resolution.

I think about how many people carry the weight of an unfinished conversation with someone who died before they got the chance to have it. The apology never offered. The forgiveness never spoken out loud. What this stage suggests is that none of that has to stay unfinished forever simply because it did not get resolved here. It can still happen there, fully and completely, in a form of understanding that does not need words at all.

If you are grieving someone you never got to make peace with, I hope this gives you something gentler to carry. The conversation is not necessarily over. It may simply be waiting for a kind of understanding that only becomes possible once both souls are finally free enough to have it.

Browse more articles

Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.

The life review is a mirror, not a courtroom

Of all seven stages Edgar Cayce's readings describe in the soul's journey after death, the life review is the one that seems to worry people most. I think it is the word review itself. It sounds like an evaluation, something with a pass or fail attached to it. So when people ask me about it, there is almost always a flicker of nervousness underneath the question, even from people who consider themselves fairly at peace with their lives.

What I have found in this research is that the life review is nothing like what that nervousness expects. According to Cayce, the soul relives its entire life, but not the way we remember things here, mostly from our own point of view. In this review, the soul experiences its life from both sides at once. Its own perspective, and the perspective of everyone its choices touched.

That means a small kindness offered to a stranger on an ordinary day gets felt again, this time from the stranger's side too, the relief or comfort it actually gave them, maybe more than the person ever realized in the moment. It also means a moment of hurt caused to someone else gets felt the same way, honestly and completely, but without cruelty attached to it. The purpose is not to shame the soul. It is to help the soul finally see, with total clarity, what its life meant.

I keep using the word mirror when I think about this stage, because that is what it feels like from everything I have read. A mirror does not punish you for what it shows you. It simply shows you the truth, clearly, so you can do something with it. That is what this review is described as doing. Showing a soul its whole life, including the parts it might have judged harshly here, but held together with compassion rather than condemnation.

If you carry guilt over choices you have made, or worry about how your life will be judged when it ends, I hope this offers something different to hold onto. What waits, according to this teaching, is not a courtroom. It is understanding, and it is far more forgiving than most of us expect to be forgiven.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

The seven stages of the soul's journey after death

I keep coming back to the same material lately, sitting with Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what happens in the moments and days right after it. The last piece I shared with you was more of an overview, the general shape of the journey. But the deeper I get into this research, the more I find that the transition itself unfolds in stages, almost like a sequence a soul moves through, each one building on the one before it. I want to walk you through all seven of them today, because I think there is something for everyone in this list. Whether you are grieving someone right now, or sitting with your own quiet fear of dying one day, I think you will find something here that settles you.

What strikes me most, working through this material stage by stage, is how deliberate the whole process feels. Nothing about it reads as chaotic or accidental. Each stage has a purpose. Each one moves the soul a little further from fear and a little closer to understanding. By the time you get through all seven, death starts to look less like something that happens to a person and more like something a soul does, on purpose, as part of a much longer story.

I think it helps to picture these stages less like a checklist and more like the way a person slowly wakes up from a very deep sleep. First there is simple release, the heaviness lifting. Then awareness comes back, gradually, until it is sharper than it was even before sleep. Then comes the moment of taking stock, understanding where you are and what just happened. Then the people who love you come into view. Then you realize you can move freely again. Then the reason for the whole night's rest starts to make sense. And finally, rested and clear, you decide what your day is going to look like. That is roughly the shape of what these readings describe, except instead of a night's sleep, it is an entire lifetime the soul is waking up from.

Stage one: release from the physical body

The journey begins the moment the soul separates from the body, and according to Cayce's readings, this happens without pain and without fear. Whatever suffering the body was experiencing in its final hours or days ends immediately at this point. The soul is free of it, completely and at once.

What I find so tender about this first stage is the description of the soul often looking back on the scene it just left with calm curiosity rather than distress. It is not frantic. It is not disoriented in the way we might imagine. There is a settled quality to it, a sense of recognizing, almost for the first time, that the body was only ever a vehicle. Something the soul wore for a while, not something the soul actually was.

I think about how much fear so many of us carry around the physical act of dying itself, the fear of pain, of suffocation, of a frightening final moment. This stage offers something different. It suggests that whatever the body went through in its last hours, the soul's actual experience of leaving it is peaceful. The hard part, if there was a hard part, belonged to the body. The soul simply steps free.

I hear this fear most often from people who sat at a bedside and watched someone struggle to breathe in their final hours, or who were not there at all and are now haunted by imagining what those last moments might have felt like. What this stage offers both of them is the same reassurance. The struggle you witnessed, or the struggle you are imagining, was the body's struggle, not the soul's. By the time release actually happens, the readings suggest the soul has already largely moved past that struggle. It is not trapped inside the discomfort of a failing body during the transition itself. It is already stepping out of it.

Stage two: expanded perception

Once free of the body, the soul's awareness does not shrink. It expands, and from what I can tell in these readings, it expands dramatically. Cayce describes this as a shift into a kind of multidimensional perception, where the soul becomes aware of energy, thought, emotion, and spiritual presence in ways it never could while confined to a physical brain and physical senses.

Distance stops meaning what it meant before. Physical barriers, walls, doors, the space between one place and another, none of that limits the soul any longer. There is a recognition, according to this teaching, that reality itself is simply bigger than what the soul understood while it was living inside a body. Not different. Bigger. Like realizing a room you have lived in your whole life actually has doors you never noticed, opening onto an entire world outside.

I find this stage genuinely exciting to sit with, honestly. So much of grief involves imagining our loved ones as diminished somehow, smaller, further away, less capable of reaching us. This stage suggests almost the opposite. The soul is not less aware after death. It is more aware than it ever was in life.

This is also where I think a lot of the signs people report from loved ones start to make more sense. The dream that felt too vivid and too specific to be ordinary. The song that came on at exactly the right moment. The sense of a presence in a room that had nothing logical to explain it. If a soul's awareness genuinely expands the way these readings describe, reaching across the barriers that once separated it from us, then those moments stop looking like coincidence or wishful thinking. They start looking like exactly what an aware, expanded soul would naturally be capable of. Reaching toward the people it loves, using whatever means are available to let them know it is still close.

Stage three: the life review

By the time the soul reaches this third stage, it is ready to look back on the life it just completed, and here again, Cayce's readings are clear that this is not a courtroom. The soul relives its entire life, but from two angles at once. Its own perspective, and the perspective of everyone its choices touched.

Every kindness is felt again, this time from the other person's side too, the comfort or relief or joy it brought them. Every hurt is felt the same way, not to shame the soul, but so it can finally understand, completely and without the defenses we carry here, what its life actually meant to the people in it. This is described as an experience of complete clarity held together with complete compassion. Not one or the other. Both.

I think this dual nature is what makes the life review so different from the version of judgment so many of us were raised to fear. There is no one standing over the soul deciding its fate based on this review. The review itself is the growth. Seeing clearly is the point. A soul that sees, with full honesty and full compassion, exactly what its life meant to the people around it, comes out the other side of that with more wisdom, not less worth.

Stage four: reunion and encounters

After the life review, the soul is reunited with the people who have been waiting for it. Loved ones who crossed before, familiar souls from other points in its journey, and spiritual guides all come forward at this stage. Communication does not happen through spoken language the way it does here. It happens through direct thought and shared understanding, which I think is worth sitting with for a moment. There is no misunderstanding possible in a form of communication like that. No tone misread, no words chosen poorly in a hard moment. Just complete, direct understanding between souls who love each other.

These reunions are described as bringing healing and reconciliation, not just comfort. If there was distance or hurt between two people in life, this stage offers real repair of it, not surface level reassurance but something closer to full resolution. And running underneath all of it is the same message that shows up again and again throughout this material. The soul has never been alone. Not during the hardest parts of its life, and certainly not now.

I think about the clients I have sat with who carry unfinished business with someone who died before they could make peace. What this stage suggests is that the making peace does not have to happen here to happen at all. It can still happen there, fully, in a way that heals both souls involved.

I also think this is worth remembering the next time you catch yourself replaying a conversation you wish had gone differently, or wishing you had said something before it was too late to say it. This stage does not suggest that those words go unspoken forever simply because a person died before you could speak them. It suggests the opposite, that there is still a place and a way for that understanding to reach them, even now.

Stage five: freedom beyond physical limitations

By this point in the journey, the soul discovers something remarkable about how it moves through its new reality. It travels through intention alone. Wanting to be somewhere is enough to be there, whether that is a familiar earthly place it wants to visit or a higher spiritual realm it wants to explore.

What I find most meaningful about this stage is the second part of it, the realization that a soul's own inner development shapes what it is drawn toward and what it experiences. This is not a system with an outside authority deciding where a soul goes or what it gets to see. It is closer to gravity. A soul naturally moves toward the experiences and environments that match where it actually is in its own growth. Compassion draws a soul toward compassionate experiences. Love draws it toward love. There is nothing arbitrary about it, and nothing punitive either. It is simply the truth of who that soul has become, expressing itself freely for what may be the first time.

Stage six: recognition of purpose

Here the soul begins to understand its own existence on a much larger scale. Individual lifetimes, the readings suggest, start to make sense not as isolated stories but as chapters in a much longer journey of growth. Things that felt random or unfair while the soul was living through them, a hardship, a loss, an unexpected turn, are understood in this stage as opportunities. Chances to learn something, to serve someone, to grow in a direction the soul needed to grow in.

I think this stage is where so much of the pain of a hard life finally gets its context. Not erased. Not excused. But placed inside a bigger picture that makes sense of it in a way it may never have made sense while it was happening. I have talked with so many people who spent their whole lives asking why something happened to them, why they had to go through what they went through. This stage suggests that the answer to that question does eventually arrive, and that it arrives with understanding rather than more suffering attached to it.

It reminds me of how differently a hard chapter of a book reads once you have finished the whole story, compared to how it read while you were still in the middle of it. In the middle, a painful chapter can feel senseless, even cruel. Looking back from the end, you can often see exactly what that chapter was setting up, what it taught the character, how it shaped everything that came after. This stage suggests the soul finally gets to read its own story that way. Not stuck inside the hardest chapter anymore, but looking back at the whole book, seeing what that chapter was actually for.

Stage seven: choosing the next step

By the final stage, the soul has healed, remembered, reunited, and understood. And here it faces a choice. Some souls, according to this teaching, choose to continue their growth through service and learning in the spiritual realms, without returning to a body at all for a while. Others choose to come back, to take on another earthly life so they can keep developing in the particular way that only physical life allows.

This choice, Cayce's readings are careful to point out, is an act of free will. It is made with guidance from advanced spiritual helpers, not imposed as a sentence or an obligation. Nobody is forced back to earth to pay off some cosmic debt. A soul returns, if it returns, because it wants to keep becoming more of who it is capable of being, the same way a person might choose to go back to school not because they are being punished but because there is more they want to learn.

Consciousness is An ongoing process, not a final stop

What I want to leave you with, after walking through all seven of these stages, is something Cayce's readings return to again and again. None of this is described as a final destination. It is a process that keeps unfolding, one that suggests consciousness itself does not end at death, and that the people we love remain connected to us in ways that do not require a body to sustain them.

There is also something in this material that I think is worth carrying into how we live right now, not just how we understand what comes after. If our spiritual condition really is shaped by the compassion, forgiveness, and love we cultivate during this life, the way these readings suggest, then every ordinary choice we make matters more than it might seem to in the moment. The patience we offer someone on a hard day. The forgiveness we choose to extend, even when it is difficult. The love we let ourselves feel and express, even when it would be easier to guard against it. None of that is separate from the soul's larger journey. It is the soul's larger journey, happening one choice at a time, right here, long before any of us reach that first stage of release.

If you are grieving someone right now, I hope these seven stages give you something steady to hold onto. Your person was not lost to confusion or fear. They were met with expanded awareness, honest and compassionate understanding of their own life, reunion with everyone who loved them, freedom they never had here, a growing sense of purpose, and a real choice about what comes next. And if you are simply thinking about your own eventual turn, I hope this offers you the same thing it has given me. Not fear of an ending, but curiosity about a continuation that has been waiting for you all along.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next.

The life review: understanding, not judgment

 The life review: understanding, not judgment

So many of us grew up with a version of the afterlife built around a courtroom. A tally of sins. A judge waiting to decide whether we measured up. Even people who left that picture behind a long time ago intellectually still sometimes feel it sitting somewhere underneath, especially in the quiet moments when they think about their own death, or worry about how a loved one's life will be weighed after they are gone.

In my research into Edgar Cayce's readings, I have found something so different from that courtroom image, and I think it is worth sharing, especially for anyone carrying quiet guilt or fear about how their life will be judged when it ends.

According to Cayce, after a soul crosses over and is welcomed by the loved ones waiting for it, higher spiritual guides step in to help it understand its new surroundings. And here is the part that matters most. Their role is not to judge. It is to help the soul see its own life clearly, through a process often called a life review.

In this review, the soul does not just remember what it did. It experiences the impact those actions had on others. A moment of kindness offered to a stranger is felt from the stranger's side too, the relief or comfort it gave them. A moment of impatience or hurt caused to someone else is felt the same way, not to shame the soul, but so it can finally understand, fully, what its life actually meant.

What I keep coming back to is that this process is described as compassionate, not cruel. There is no fire, no accusation, no eternal punishment attached to it. The purpose is growth. The soul is meant to walk away from this review with more understanding of itself, more compassion, more clarity about who it truly is underneath its mistakes.

I think about the people I have connected with, on both sides, who have carried guilt over things left unsaid or unresolved. What this teaching offers is real comfort. If the life review shows a soul the full truth of its own life, including all the love that was underneath its worst moments, then whatever regret or guilt weighed on someone here does not follow them into judgment there. It follows them into understanding instead.

That is such a different way to think about what waits for us. Not a courtroom. A mirror held with grace.

Continue reading?

You might also enjoy The Seven Stages of the Soul's Journey After Death, where I walk through the life review alongside six other stages the soul moves through, including reunion, healing, and what happens once a soul chooses its next step.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

You are never alone when you cross over

One of the questions I get asked most often, usually in a whisper, usually by someone who has just lost their person, is some version of "were they scared? Were they alone?" It is such a natural thing to wonder. We spend our whole lives trying to make sure the people we love are not alone in hard moments, and death feels like the hardest moment of all to imagine someone facing by themselves.

I have spent a good bit of time recently in Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what comes after it, and this is the piece that keeps landing hardest for me. According to that material, nobody crosses over alone. Not once. Not ever.

The moment a soul separates from the body, it is met. Not eventually, not after some period of confusion or wandering, but right there at the threshold. The ones who show up are almost always someone the soul already loved. A parent who went before them. A spouse. A childhood friend. So often, and this is the part that gets people every time, it is a pet. The dog who used to wait by the door. The cat who slept curled against their leg for fifteen years. These readings describe them all as present, waiting, ready.

What I find so moving is that the greeting is not random. According to Cayce, the soul is met first by whoever can most gently ease its fear. Whoever loved them in the simplest, safest way is who shows up to walk them through that first threshold. If a person's most uncomplicated source of comfort in life was their grandmother's kitchen, it might be their grandmother standing there. If it was the golden retriever who never once judged them, it might be that dog.

I think about how often we sit at a bedside in someone's final hours, terrified that despite our presence, despite holding their hand, they will still somehow feel alone in the moment they slip away. What this teaching offers is a different picture entirely. It says that the second the body lets go, someone who loves that person completely is already there, waiting to catch them.

If you are grieving someone right now and this fear has been sitting with you, sitting under all your other grief, I hope this gives you something to hold onto. They were not alone. They were met by love, immediately, by exactly the ones who could ease them into what comes next.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next.

 

What happens when we die? Edgar Cayce's gentle vision of the soul's journey

I have spent a lot of time sitting with people in the rawest moments of their grief. The question that comes up more than any other, whether it is spoken out loud or just sitting behind someone's eyes, is some version of "where did they go?" It is the question underneath every other question. It is why people call me for readings in the first place. And it is the question I keep coming back to in my own research, because I think the answer matters more than almost anything else we can offer someone who is grieving.

Over the past several months I have been spending time with Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what comes after it. If you are not familiar with him, Cayce was an American psychic who, while in a self-induced trance state, gave thousands of readings over more than forty years on everything from health and healing to reincarnation, dreams, and the nature of the soul. People still study his work today because of how consistent and how strikingly compassionate his descriptions of the afterlife are. What struck me most, working through this material, is how far it is from the fire and judgment so many of us grew up fearing. Cayce's readings describe death not as an ending or a punishment, but as a passage. A gentle one. And the more I sit with that vision, the more I believe it is something people desperately need to hear, especially the ones I talk to who are still standing at the edge of a fresh loss, terrified for the person they lost and terrified for themselves.

So I want to walk you through what these readings actually describe, step by step, the way I understand them after this research. Not as abstract theology, but as something you can hold onto.

I also want to say, before I get into it, why this particular piece of research has stayed with me longer than most. In my work I hear a lot of fear around dying. Fear of pain, fear of judgment, fear of simply ceasing to exist. What I have noticed in reading through Cayce's material is that almost none of that fear shows up in his descriptions. There is no hell in these readings, no tribunal, no eternal punishment waiting for the imperfect. There is instead a picture of death as something the soul has already done many times before, something it knows how to do, even if the personality living inside a body in any given lifetime has forgotten. I think that distinction matters. The soul is not learning something brand new when it dies. It is remembering.

The moment of leaving the body

According to Cayce's readings, the soul does not rip away from the body in some violent, disorienting instant. It separates gently, the way you might slip out of a heavy coat you have been wearing so long you forgot it was ever removable. There is often a period, brief but real, where the soul is still aware of its connection to the body it is leaving. It may hover close for a while, taking in what is happening, before it fully releases into the spiritual realm.

What I find most comforting about this part of the teaching is what happens to awareness in that moment. The soul does not become foggy or diminished. It becomes more alive than it was in the physical body, not less. Cayce described consciousness continuing, sharpening even, once free of the limitations of flesh. The person you loved is not fading into nothing when they die. They are, according to this teaching, waking up into something clearer and freer than the life they just left.

I think about how often we say to someone in the last days of an illness, "just let go, it's okay to go." We say it because we sense, on some level, that there is nowhere frightening for them to go to. This teaching gives language to that sense. It says the letting go is not a fall into darkness. It is a release into more light, more freedom, more aliveness than we can access here.

This also lines up with something so many hospice workers and family members describe but rarely talk about openly, which is the strange lucidity that sometimes shows up right before someone dies. A person who has been confused for weeks suddenly speaks clearly. Someone reaches toward the corner of the room, or says a name out loud that nobody else recognizes. I do not think that is a coincidence, and neither, from what I can tell, did Cayce. If the soul is already beginning to loosen its grip on the body, already sensing the presence of what is waiting on the other side, that kind of moment starts to make a lot more sense. It is not the mind failing. It is the soul arriving somewhere new while the body is still catching up.

No one crosses over alone

This is the piece I share most often with clients, because it is the piece that seems to bring the fastest relief. According to Cayce's readings, nobody makes this crossing by themselves. The newly departed soul is met, almost immediately, by presences who love them.

These are often family members who died before them. A mother, a father, a spouse, a sibling. Sometimes it is a close friend. And so often, especially with the clients I work with, it is a beloved pet, the dog or cat who was there through years of ordinary life and is somehow there again at the very end of it. The readings also describe spiritual beings whose entire purpose in that moment is comfort and reassurance, guides whose job is simply to help a frightened or confused soul feel safe.

There is something specific and, I think, deeply wise about who shows up first. It is not random. The readings suggest that the first beings a soul encounters are the ones best suited to ease that particular soul's transition. Whoever can most gently dissolve that person's fear, whoever can most naturally help them release their grip on earthly life, that is who greets them. If someone was closest to their grandmother in life, it might be their grandmother waiting. If a person's fiercest, most uncomplicated love was for the dog who slept at the foot of their bed for twelve years, it might be that dog.

I tell my clients this often, because so many of them are haunted by the image of their loved one dying scared and alone, even when they were surrounded by family in a hospital room. What this teaching offers is the idea that whatever loneliness or fear the body felt in its final hours, the soul does not carry that forward. The moment it crosses, it is met. Immediately. By exactly who it needed.

The higher guides and the life review

Once that first, tender welcome has settled the soul, Cayce's readings describe higher spiritual guides stepping in to help it understand where it is and what is happening. And here is something I think is worth sitting with for a moment: these guides are not described as judges. They do not arrive to hand down a sentence or tally up sins. Their role, according to the readings, is to walk alongside the soul as it looks back on the life it just lived.

This is often called a life review, and it is one of the most detailed and, I think, one of the most beautiful parts of Cayce's teaching. The soul is shown its life again, but not the way we experience memory here, where we mostly remember our own side of things. In the life review, the soul experiences the ripple effects of what it did. A kind word offered to a stranger on a hard day. A moment of impatience with a child. The way a small act of generosity changed the course of someone else's afternoon, or year, or life. Every choice is seen not just from the soul's own vantage point but from the vantage point of everyone it touched.

What Cayce's readings are clear about is that this is not about punishment. There is no fire, no accusation, no eternal shame attached to this process. The purpose is understanding. The soul is meant to see clearly, with compassion rather than cruelty, what its life actually meant, so it can grow from what it sees. I find this such a striking contrast to the version of the afterlife so many of us absorbed as children, the one built on fear and threat. This is a version built on honesty and grace held together at once.

If you have ever worried about a loved one who passed carrying regret, guilt, or unfinished business, this part of the teaching offers something real. It suggests that whatever they did not resolve here, they are gently helped to understand and make peace with there, not condemned for it.

I think about a woman I read for a while back whose mother had died still angry with her over something that, in the end, was fairly small. She had spent months afterward terrified that her mother crossed over still carrying that anger toward her, still holding the grudge. What this teaching offers someone in that position is a different possibility. If the life review is truly about seeing a life through the eyes of everyone it touched, then her mother would have seen, clearly and without the defensiveness we carry here, exactly how much she loved her daughter underneath the argument. That kind of clarity is part of what makes the life review a mercy rather than a trial. It does not just show the soul its mistakes. It shows the soul the love that was always underneath them.

A place to heal

After the life review, the readings describe the soul entering a period of rest and restoration. This is not a quick stop. It is described as an actual realm, a peaceful space where the exhaustion, grief, and pain the soul carried from earthly life are allowed to dissolve.

I think this part gets overlooked sometimes because it is quieter than the dramatic moments of crossing over or the life review, but I think it might be the most tender part of the whole teaching. Life is hard. Even the fullest, most loved life carries wounds, disappointments, physical suffering, heartbreak. Cayce's readings suggest that none of that is meant to be carried forever. There are healing beings and guides in this realm whose role is simply to help the soul recover, the way you might finally exhale after holding your breath through something difficult for a very long time.

For someone who watched a parent suffer through a long illness, or lost a spouse to something sudden and violent, or said goodbye to a child, I think this piece of the teaching matters enormously. It says that whatever pain your loved one carried at the end, whatever suffering marked their final days, none of it followed them into what came next. It says there is a place built specifically to undo that kind of damage. To let a soul become whole again.

This is also, I think, why so many mediums, myself included, sense such a settled peace when we connect with someone who has been gone for a while, even if their passing was traumatic. The people I connect with rarely come through carrying the fear or pain of their final moments. What comes through instead is warmth, humor, love, the person as they truly are underneath everything that hurt them at the end. I used to think that was simply the nature of spirit communication. Reading Cayce's work gave me a fuller explanation for why that might be. If healing is a built in stage of the soul's journey, not an exception but a guarantee, then of course the person coming through years later feels whole. They have had time, in a very real sense, to become whole again.

Choosing what comes next

Once a soul has healed and regained its clarity, Cayce's readings describe it reaching a point where it considers what comes next. This is where the idea of reincarnation enters his work, though it is described with more nuance than the word alone suggests.

According to the readings, the soul is offered choices about how it wants to continue growing. That might mean returning to earth for another lifetime, to learn something it did not finish learning, or to be present for people it is meant to walk alongside again. Or it might mean continuing its growth in the spiritual realms themselves, through service, learning, and deeper understanding, without returning to a body at all.

What I want to be clear about, because I think it matters, is that none of this is described as an obligation or a sentence. It is not karma in the sense of punishment, where a soul is forced back to pay off some cosmic debt. Cayce's readings frame it as an act of free will, guided by wisdom rather than compulsion. The soul chooses its next step the way someone might choose the next course of study, because they want to keep growing, not because they are being made to.

I find this such a hopeful reframe of reincarnation, honestly. It is not a wheel a soul is trapped on. It is a path a soul walks because it wants to keep becoming more of who it truly is.

What this means for your own fear of dying

I would be leaving something out if I only talked about what this teaching means for the people we have already lost. So much of the fear around death is not really about the people who have gone before us. It is about our own turn. Most of us carry some version of that fear quietly, even if we do not say it out loud very often.

What I keep coming back to, the more time I spend with this material, is how thoroughly it dismantles the idea of death as a threat. There is no version of this journey, according to Cayce's readings, where a soul is left to face what comes next by itself. There is no version where a life is measured only by its worst moments. There is no version where healing is optional or where growth is forced. Every stage of this journey, from the first release from the body to the eventual return to the Divine, is built around love, not fear.

I do not say that to minimize the very real grief of leaving people and a life you love behind. That loss is real, and it deserves to be honored, not talked away. But I think there is real comfort in knowing that whatever this transition asks of us, it does not ask us to face it alone, to be judged without mercy, or to carry our wounds forever. If Cayce's readings are even partly right, dying is far less an ending to fear and far more a homecoming to trust.

The return to the Divine

Underneath every stage of this journey, from the gentle release from the body, to the welcome by loved ones, to the life review, to the healing, to the choosing, there is a single thread running through all of it according to Cayce's readings. Every experience, every lesson, every bit of guidance received along the way, is part of one long movement back toward union with the Divine.

Death, in this teaching, is not the opposite of life. It is not an ending at all. It is a return. The whole of a soul's journey, the earthly life it just completed and everything that follows after, is understood as steps home. And love is described as the force that holds that entire journey together, from the first moment of crossing to the last.

I think this is the piece I want to leave you with most of all. If you are grieving someone right now, if you lie awake wondering whether they are okay, whether they are scared, whether they are alone, I hope what you take from this research is a simple, steady reassurance. According to these readings, they were met the instant they crossed. They were held with understanding, not judgment, as they looked back on their life. They were given rest for whatever they were carrying. And they remain, even now, on a path that leads home.

No soul, according to this teaching, is ever truly alone. And I do not believe that ends with the ones who have already crossed. I believe it includes the ones of us still here, missing them, waiting for our own turn to understand what they now already know.

Ready to experience a reading?

If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to walk that path with you. You can book a mediumship reading at aperfectsoul.com.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

Common Myths About Mediumship, Debunked

Over the years, I've heard just about every misconception a person could have about mediumship, usually from someone sitting nervously across from me right before their very first reading. I don't blame anyone for believing these things. Movies, television, and a handful of bad experiences with less careful practitioners have shaped a lot of assumptions that simply don't match what this work actually looks like. (I used to believe in bad "ghosts" before learning mediumship!)

One of the most common myths is that a medium can summon anyone on command, as if death is a phone directory and I can just look up whoever you'd like to speak with. That isn't how it works, at least not in my experience. I don't control who comes through or when. I can invite communication, but I can't force a specific person to appear simply because that's who the sitter was hoping for.

Another myth I hear often is that a good medium should be able to answer any question instantly, with total certainty, the moment it's asked. Real communication with spirit doesn't function like a search engine. It unfolds more like a conversation, sometimes circling around a subject before arriving at it directly, sometimes leaving certain questions unanswered entirely for reasons that only become clear later, if they become clear at all.

People also frequently believe that mediumship is inherently dark or dangerous, something that opens a door best left closed. I understand where that fear comes from, but nothing in my own experience supports it. What consistently comes through in readings is love, reassurance, and connection, not anything sinister. The work has always felt, to me, like an extension of compassion rather than something to fear.

There's also a common assumption that mediums can read minds or know everything about a person's life without any information being shared. That isn't accurate either. What I receive comes from spirit, not from scanning a person's private thoughts, and a responsible medium should never claim otherwise.

Finally, I often meet people who believe that if a reading doesn't feel dramatic or overwhelming, it must not have been real. I'd gently push back on that one most of all. Some of the most meaningful readings I've ever witnessed were quiet, almost understated, built around small, ordinary details that meant everything to the person receiving them. Real connection rarely needs theatrics to be genuine.

If you've been holding back from booking a reading because of one of these misconceptions, I hope this helps put your mind a little more at ease. Mediumship, at its best, isn't about spectacle. It's about honest, careful communication between people who love each other, even when one of them is no longer here in a body we can see.

---

Many Readers continue Here

Continue Reading? You might also enjoy What I Wish Everyone Knew About Mediumship Before Booking Their First Reading, where I share more about what actually matters most before you sit down for your own session.

Ready to Experience a Reading? If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to work with you.

Book a mediumship reading at www.aperfectsoul.com

Browse More Articles Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.

 

How to Prepare for Your First Mediumship Reading

People often ask me what they should do beforehand to get ready for their first reading, as if there's a checklist that will guarantee a better outcome. I understand the instinct. When you've waited a long time for this, and it means so much, it's natural to want to do everything right. The truth is, the preparation that matters most has very little to do with logistics and everything to do with your own state of mind.

The most useful thing you can do is simply come with an open heart rather than a fixed agenda. I know that's easier said than done, especially if you've spent months hoping to hear something very specific. But readings tend to unfold most naturally when a person isn't gripping tightly to one particular outcome. That doesn't mean your hopes don't matter. It means holding them a little more loosely, so you can actually receive what comes rather than measuring everything against what you expected to hear.

You don't need to bring a long list of questions, although it's fine if you want to. What matters more is being ready to simply say yes or no honestly when I share something, rather than working hard to make a piece of evidence fit. The clearest, most meaningful readings happen when a sitter trusts their own immediate reaction instead of trying to force a connection.

It also helps to get a decent night's sleep beforehand if you can, and to avoid rushing into the reading straight from something stressful. You don't need to meditate for an hour or prepare in any elaborate spiritual sense. You simply want to arrive as calm and present as your circumstances allow, so you can actually notice and absorb what's happening instead of being distracted by everything else going on in your day.

I'd also gently encourage you to release any pressure to cry, or not cry, or to have a particular kind of emotional experience. Grief doesn't follow a script, and neither does healing. Some people leave a reading feeling deeply emotional. Others leave feeling strangely light and calm. Neither reaction is more correct than the other.

Above all, I'd say come as yourself. You don't need to be especially spiritual, and you don't need any prior experience with mediumship to have a meaningful reading. What matters most is your willingness to be present, honest, and open to whatever your loved one wants to share, even if it isn't exactly what you were expecting to hear.

---

More to Explore

Continue Reading? You might also like What Actually Happens During a Mediumship Reading, where I walk through exactly what to expect once the session begins.

Ready to Experience a Reading? If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to work with you.

Book a mediumship reading at www.aperfectsoul.com

Browse More Articles Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.