What an 18th-century scientist saw in heaven: Emanuel Swedenborg's vision of the afterlife

I want to introduce you to someone whose work has been sitting quietly behind a lot of what I write about, even before I started this Edgar Cayce research. His name was Emanuel Swedenborg, and if you have never heard of him, you are far from alone. But once you know his story, I think you will understand why so many serious thinkers, scientists, and writers over the last two hundred and fifty years have taken him seriously, even when his claims sound almost too strange to believe.

Swedenborg was born in Stockholm in 1688, into a devoutly religious family, and he spent the first half of his life as one of the most respected scientists in Europe. He was an inventor, an engineer, an anatomist, a mining expert given a seat among Swedish nobility by the crown. This was not a fringe figure or a wandering mystic with no credibility to lose. This was a man of rigorous, established scientific standing, the kind of person you would least expect to spend the last twenty-seven years of his life claiming daily conversations with angels.

But that is exactly what happened. At the age of fifty-six, Swedenborg entered what he described as a spiritual awakening, a period of intense dreams and visions that culminated in what he believed was direct contact with the divine. From that point in 1745 until his death in 1772, he claimed his eyes had been opened to freely visit heaven and hell, to speak with angels, spirits, and the souls of people he had known and people he never had, and to bring back detailed reports of what he found there. He wrote it all down, meticulously, the same careful documentation you would expect from the scientist he had always been. His most famous work, Heaven and Hell, remains in print today, nearly three hundred years later, and its influence has reached figures as varied as the poet William Blake, the philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson, and the writer Jorge Luis Borges.

I find myself drawn back to Swedenborg's work again and again in my own research, because so much of what he described lines up with what I have come to understand through years of mediumship, and with what shows up again and again across other traditions I have studied, including Cayce's readings. When multiple sources this different from each other, separated by centuries and continents and completely different starting points, keep describing the same underlying shape of the afterlife, I think that convergence is worth paying attention to.

It also helps to understand a little about how Swedenborg himself described these experiences, because it was not passive dreaming or vague impressions. He wrote that he was fully conscious during these visits, walking through spiritual landscapes and holding conversations the same way he might describe walking through a garden and talking with a friend. He kept a spiritual diary for decades, recording what he saw and heard in careful, dated entries. Whatever you make of his claims, the sheer discipline and consistency of the record he left behind is unusual. This was not a man prone to embellishment. It was a scientist, applying the same rigor to the afterlife that he had once applied to anatomy and engineering.

Heaven and hell are not places you get sent

The first thing that struck me reading Swedenborg's work is how differently he frames the whole concept of heaven and hell. We tend to think of them as destinations, places assigned to us after some kind of judgment, the way a court might assign a sentence. Swedenborg describes something far more intimate than that, and honestly, far more just.

According to his writings, heaven and hell are not verdicts handed down by an external authority. They are expressions of who a person has actually become over the course of their life. Someone oriented toward love, toward genuine care for others, toward what Swedenborg calls "the good of the neighbor," naturally gravitates toward the company and the state of being that we call heaven. Someone oriented instead toward the love of self, toward using others for their own gain, naturally gravitates toward what we call hell. Nobody is sent anywhere. Souls sort themselves, drawn by the pull of what they already love most.

I think this reframe matters enormously, especially for anyone carrying old fears about a punishing God waiting to catch them in a mistake. Swedenborg's vision removes the punisher from the picture entirely. What replaces it is something closer to natural law. You become what you love, and after death, you simply continue being that, in the company of others who share it.

I think about how often this shows up in the fears people bring to me in readings, the quiet worry that a loved one's flaws, their temper, their mistakes, their unfinished growth, might have counted against them in some final tally. Swedenborg's framework offers something gentler than a tally. It suggests that what actually determines someone's experience after death is not a record of individual failures weighed against successes, but the deeper orientation of their heart, the thing they spent their life actually loving most, underneath all the mistakes along the way. A person who loved genuinely, even imperfectly, even with real flaws, still gravitates toward that same natural state of warmth and connection. The imperfection does not disqualify the love.

The soul does not change instantly at death

One detail from Swedenborg's writings that I find especially moving is his description of what happens in the earliest period after death, a stage he calls the world of spirits. This is not heaven, and it is not hell. It is something closer to a threshold, a middle realm where the soul spends time adjusting before it moves on to wherever it will ultimately settle.

During this period, Swedenborg describes the soul gradually shedding the outer self it maintained during physical life, the version of itself shaped by social expectation, by the need to manage how others perceived it. Bit by bit, what remains is the soul's true underlying character, the part that was always there beneath the performance of daily life. This process is not sudden. It unfolds gradually, gently, giving the soul time to recognize and settle into who it actually is, free of the pressures that shaped its outer behavior while alive.

I think about how much of our lives here are spent managing impressions, softening our real feelings, presenting a version of ourselves calibrated to what other people expect. Swedenborg's description suggests that none of that survives death. What is left, eventually, is simply the truth of who you were underneath it all. For some people that might be an uncomfortable thought. But I find it strangely relieving. There is nowhere left to hide, but there is also nothing left to perform. You finally just get to be exactly who you are.

This also offers something I think is worth sitting with if you are grieving someone whose final years were marked by illness, confusion, or a personality that seemed to change under the weight of suffering. Swedenborg's description suggests that whatever surface distortions physical decline or hardship placed over a person's true nature, none of that is permanent. The world of spirits is where those layers fall away. What emerges afterward is not the confused or diminished version you may have witnessed at the end, but the person's actual, underlying self, restored and whole.

Angels were once people like us

One detail that surprised me most in this research is Swedenborg's insistence that angels are not a separate category of being, created differently from humans and stationed above us in some cosmic hierarchy. According to his writings, every angel was once a human being who lived an earthly life and, through the natural sorting process described above, settled into heaven after death. There is no separate species of angel. There is only us, at different points along the same continuum.

This connects to something I hear constantly from clients, the hope that a parent, a spouse, a child who has passed might in some sense still be watching over them, guiding them, present in a way that feels almost angelic. Swedenborg's framework suggests that hope is not naive. If angels are simply souls who have settled fully into love, then the people we lost, if they lived with real love and care, are not so far from that description themselves. The line between "someone I loved" and "an angel" turns out to be much thinner than we usually imagine.

I should say, in fairness, that Swedenborg had critics in his own time and has them still. Some of his contemporaries dismissed his visions outright, and modern skeptics point out that there is no way to verify any of it against physical evidence, the same limitation that applies to most firsthand spiritual testimony. I don't think that skepticism should be dismissed. It is a reasonable response to an extraordinary claim. But I also think it is worth noticing that a man with everything to lose professionally, a respected scientist with a reputation built over decades, chose to spend the last third of his life documenting these experiences anyway, in careful, methodical detail, at real risk to how history would remember him. That choice does not prove his visions were real. But it does suggest he believed, with total conviction, that they were.

The structure of heaven itself

Swedenborg's descriptions of heaven itself are remarkably detailed, more detailed than almost any other account I have come across in this research. He describes heaven as organized not by geography the way we understand it, but by what he calls correspondence, meaning the outer form of heaven mirrors the inner spiritual state of the souls who inhabit it. Communities form around shared loves and shared understanding. Souls with similar inner natures are drawn together, not by force, but by the same natural gravity that shapes everything else in this framework.

He also describes heaven as tiered, not in a hierarchy of reward but in something closer to depth of understanding and capacity for love. Some souls exist in what he calls the celestial heaven, closest to direct, intuitive love of the divine. Others exist in the spiritual heaven, understanding truth more through reason and conscious insight. Both are described as complete and joyful in their own right. Neither is lesser. They are simply different expressions of the same underlying reality, suited to the particular soul experiencing them.

What I appreciate about this structure is how it avoids the trap so many afterlife descriptions fall into, the idea that heaven is a single uniform reward handed out equally to everyone regardless of who they actually are. Swedenborg's heaven adapts to the soul, rather than asking the soul to conform to some fixed, generic version of paradise. It sounds, in a strange way, like the most personalized experience imaginable, tailored exactly to who you have become.

He goes even further, describing entire communities within heaven organized around particular kinds of usefulness and love, the way a person who spent their life caring for others might find themselves among a community centered on that same nurturing quality, while someone whose love expressed itself through wisdom or teaching might settle among others oriented the same way. Nothing here is wasted or set aside. The particular shape of a person's love in life becomes, in Swedenborg's afterlife, the very thing that places them exactly where they belong.

Marriage and love continue

One of the more tender details in Swedenborg's writings concerns what happens to deep romantic love after death. He describes something he calls conjugial love, a union between two souls so complete that it continues, and can even deepen, in the afterlife. Not every earthly marriage qualifies, in his framework. He is specific that this describes a true spiritual union between two people whose inner natures are genuinely matched, rather than simply a legal or social arrangement. But when that kind of bond exists, Swedenborg suggests it does not end with death. It continues, and grows.

I think about how often people ask me, in readings, whether they will be reunited with a spouse they lost, whether that particular love, the one that shaped so much of their life, still exists somewhere. Swedenborg's answer, if his visions are to be trusted, is a clear yes, with the added suggestion that the truest version of that love might only become more fully itself once free of the practical burdens and misunderstandings that so often complicate love here on earth.

I find this detail especially meaningful for anyone who lost a spouse after decades together, the kind of bond that outlasted illness, hardship, the ordinary friction of a long shared life. Swedenborg's writing suggests that everything that made that bond real, the loyalty, the tenderness, the particular way two people came to understand each other over the years, is not lost with the body. If anything, it is finally unburdened, free to exist without the practical weight that so often gets tangled up with love while both people are still living in the physical world. What remains, in his description, is love in its purest and most complete form.

Why this matters alongside everything else I have researched

I want to be honest about something. Swedenborg's theology is enormous and complex, built over decades and spanning dozens of volumes, and I am only able to touch the surface of it here. He was also, without question, a man of his particular time and culture, and some of his framing reflects the religious language of eighteenth-century Christianity in ways that will not resonate with every reader equally.But what keeps bringing me back to his work is the underlying shape of what he describes. A soul that continues after death, unforced into a fixed fate, but naturally settling into the state its own love has already built. A period of gentle adjustment after death rather than instant, jarring judgment. Relationships and love that continue rather than dissolve. Angels who are simply us, further along. None of that is unique to Swedenborg alone. I have found variations of every one of these ideas across Cayce's readings, and I expect I will keep finding them as I continue researching other mystics, mediums, and even scientific researchers who have taken death seriously enough to study it closely.

I think that pattern, showing up again across sources with nothing else in common, is itself a kind of evidence. Not proof, in the way a laboratory experiment might offer proof, but something quieter and, to me, just as meaningful. A consistency that suggests these accounts might be pointing toward something real, glimpsed from different angles by people separated by centuries, culture, and belief, who nonetheless keep describing the same underlying truth about what waits for us. Love continues. Growth continues. And nothing about who you truly are is lost.

Ready to experience a reading?

If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to walk that path with you. You can book a mediumship reading at aperfectsoul.com.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

The reunion that waits on the other side

There is a stage in Edgar Cayce's readings on the soul's journey after death that I think about often, especially when I am sitting with someone who lost a person before they got the chance to fully make peace with them. It comes after the soul has released from the body, expanded into a fuller awareness, and moved through the honest, compassionate review of the life it just lived. Once all of that has happened, the soul is reunited.

According to these readings, this reunion brings together loved ones who crossed before, familiar souls from other points in the soul's journey, and spiritual guides who have been present all along. What stands out to me most is how the communication happens at this stage. Not through spoken words, but through direct thought and shared understanding. I think that detail matters more than it might seem to at first. So much pain between people here comes from words chosen poorly in a hard moment, or a tone that got misread, or something important that never got said in time. In this kind of communication, none of that is possible. There is no misunderstanding to untangle. Just complete understanding, shared directly, soul to soul.

These reunions are described as bringing real healing and reconciliation, not just comfort. If there was distance or hurt between two people in life, this stage offers actual repair of it, not a surface level reassurance but something closer to full resolution.

I think about how many people carry the weight of an unfinished conversation with someone who died before they got the chance to have it. The apology never offered. The forgiveness never spoken out loud. What this stage suggests is that none of that has to stay unfinished forever simply because it did not get resolved here. It can still happen there, fully and completely, in a form of understanding that does not need words at all.

If you are grieving someone you never got to make peace with, I hope this gives you something gentler to carry. The conversation is not necessarily over. It may simply be waiting for a kind of understanding that only becomes possible once both souls are finally free enough to have it.

Browse more articles

Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.

The life review is a mirror, not a courtroom

Of all seven stages Edgar Cayce's readings describe in the soul's journey after death, the life review is the one that seems to worry people most. I think it is the word review itself. It sounds like an evaluation, something with a pass or fail attached to it. So when people ask me about it, there is almost always a flicker of nervousness underneath the question, even from people who consider themselves fairly at peace with their lives.

What I have found in this research is that the life review is nothing like what that nervousness expects. According to Cayce, the soul relives its entire life, but not the way we remember things here, mostly from our own point of view. In this review, the soul experiences its life from both sides at once. Its own perspective, and the perspective of everyone its choices touched.

That means a small kindness offered to a stranger on an ordinary day gets felt again, this time from the stranger's side too, the relief or comfort it actually gave them, maybe more than the person ever realized in the moment. It also means a moment of hurt caused to someone else gets felt the same way, honestly and completely, but without cruelty attached to it. The purpose is not to shame the soul. It is to help the soul finally see, with total clarity, what its life meant.

I keep using the word mirror when I think about this stage, because that is what it feels like from everything I have read. A mirror does not punish you for what it shows you. It simply shows you the truth, clearly, so you can do something with it. That is what this review is described as doing. Showing a soul its whole life, including the parts it might have judged harshly here, but held together with compassion rather than condemnation.

If you carry guilt over choices you have made, or worry about how your life will be judged when it ends, I hope this offers something different to hold onto. What waits, according to this teaching, is not a courtroom. It is understanding, and it is far more forgiving than most of us expect to be forgiven.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

The seven stages of the soul's journey after death

I keep coming back to the same material lately, sitting with Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what happens in the moments and days right after it. The last piece I shared with you was more of an overview, the general shape of the journey. But the deeper I get into this research, the more I find that the transition itself unfolds in stages, almost like a sequence a soul moves through, each one building on the one before it. I want to walk you through all seven of them today, because I think there is something for everyone in this list. Whether you are grieving someone right now, or sitting with your own quiet fear of dying one day, I think you will find something here that settles you.

What strikes me most, working through this material stage by stage, is how deliberate the whole process feels. Nothing about it reads as chaotic or accidental. Each stage has a purpose. Each one moves the soul a little further from fear and a little closer to understanding. By the time you get through all seven, death starts to look less like something that happens to a person and more like something a soul does, on purpose, as part of a much longer story.

I think it helps to picture these stages less like a checklist and more like the way a person slowly wakes up from a very deep sleep. First there is simple release, the heaviness lifting. Then awareness comes back, gradually, until it is sharper than it was even before sleep. Then comes the moment of taking stock, understanding where you are and what just happened. Then the people who love you come into view. Then you realize you can move freely again. Then the reason for the whole night's rest starts to make sense. And finally, rested and clear, you decide what your day is going to look like. That is roughly the shape of what these readings describe, except instead of a night's sleep, it is an entire lifetime the soul is waking up from.

Stage one: release from the physical body

The journey begins the moment the soul separates from the body, and according to Cayce's readings, this happens without pain and without fear. Whatever suffering the body was experiencing in its final hours or days ends immediately at this point. The soul is free of it, completely and at once.

What I find so tender about this first stage is the description of the soul often looking back on the scene it just left with calm curiosity rather than distress. It is not frantic. It is not disoriented in the way we might imagine. There is a settled quality to it, a sense of recognizing, almost for the first time, that the body was only ever a vehicle. Something the soul wore for a while, not something the soul actually was.

I think about how much fear so many of us carry around the physical act of dying itself, the fear of pain, of suffocation, of a frightening final moment. This stage offers something different. It suggests that whatever the body went through in its last hours, the soul's actual experience of leaving it is peaceful. The hard part, if there was a hard part, belonged to the body. The soul simply steps free.

I hear this fear most often from people who sat at a bedside and watched someone struggle to breathe in their final hours, or who were not there at all and are now haunted by imagining what those last moments might have felt like. What this stage offers both of them is the same reassurance. The struggle you witnessed, or the struggle you are imagining, was the body's struggle, not the soul's. By the time release actually happens, the readings suggest the soul has already largely moved past that struggle. It is not trapped inside the discomfort of a failing body during the transition itself. It is already stepping out of it.

Stage two: expanded perception

Once free of the body, the soul's awareness does not shrink. It expands, and from what I can tell in these readings, it expands dramatically. Cayce describes this as a shift into a kind of multidimensional perception, where the soul becomes aware of energy, thought, emotion, and spiritual presence in ways it never could while confined to a physical brain and physical senses.

Distance stops meaning what it meant before. Physical barriers, walls, doors, the space between one place and another, none of that limits the soul any longer. There is a recognition, according to this teaching, that reality itself is simply bigger than what the soul understood while it was living inside a body. Not different. Bigger. Like realizing a room you have lived in your whole life actually has doors you never noticed, opening onto an entire world outside.

I find this stage genuinely exciting to sit with, honestly. So much of grief involves imagining our loved ones as diminished somehow, smaller, further away, less capable of reaching us. This stage suggests almost the opposite. The soul is not less aware after death. It is more aware than it ever was in life.

This is also where I think a lot of the signs people report from loved ones start to make more sense. The dream that felt too vivid and too specific to be ordinary. The song that came on at exactly the right moment. The sense of a presence in a room that had nothing logical to explain it. If a soul's awareness genuinely expands the way these readings describe, reaching across the barriers that once separated it from us, then those moments stop looking like coincidence or wishful thinking. They start looking like exactly what an aware, expanded soul would naturally be capable of. Reaching toward the people it loves, using whatever means are available to let them know it is still close.

Stage three: the life review

By the time the soul reaches this third stage, it is ready to look back on the life it just completed, and here again, Cayce's readings are clear that this is not a courtroom. The soul relives its entire life, but from two angles at once. Its own perspective, and the perspective of everyone its choices touched.

Every kindness is felt again, this time from the other person's side too, the comfort or relief or joy it brought them. Every hurt is felt the same way, not to shame the soul, but so it can finally understand, completely and without the defenses we carry here, what its life actually meant to the people in it. This is described as an experience of complete clarity held together with complete compassion. Not one or the other. Both.

I think this dual nature is what makes the life review so different from the version of judgment so many of us were raised to fear. There is no one standing over the soul deciding its fate based on this review. The review itself is the growth. Seeing clearly is the point. A soul that sees, with full honesty and full compassion, exactly what its life meant to the people around it, comes out the other side of that with more wisdom, not less worth.

Stage four: reunion and encounters

After the life review, the soul is reunited with the people who have been waiting for it. Loved ones who crossed before, familiar souls from other points in its journey, and spiritual guides all come forward at this stage. Communication does not happen through spoken language the way it does here. It happens through direct thought and shared understanding, which I think is worth sitting with for a moment. There is no misunderstanding possible in a form of communication like that. No tone misread, no words chosen poorly in a hard moment. Just complete, direct understanding between souls who love each other.

These reunions are described as bringing healing and reconciliation, not just comfort. If there was distance or hurt between two people in life, this stage offers real repair of it, not surface level reassurance but something closer to full resolution. And running underneath all of it is the same message that shows up again and again throughout this material. The soul has never been alone. Not during the hardest parts of its life, and certainly not now.

I think about the clients I have sat with who carry unfinished business with someone who died before they could make peace. What this stage suggests is that the making peace does not have to happen here to happen at all. It can still happen there, fully, in a way that heals both souls involved.

I also think this is worth remembering the next time you catch yourself replaying a conversation you wish had gone differently, or wishing you had said something before it was too late to say it. This stage does not suggest that those words go unspoken forever simply because a person died before you could speak them. It suggests the opposite, that there is still a place and a way for that understanding to reach them, even now.

Stage five: freedom beyond physical limitations

By this point in the journey, the soul discovers something remarkable about how it moves through its new reality. It travels through intention alone. Wanting to be somewhere is enough to be there, whether that is a familiar earthly place it wants to visit or a higher spiritual realm it wants to explore.

What I find most meaningful about this stage is the second part of it, the realization that a soul's own inner development shapes what it is drawn toward and what it experiences. This is not a system with an outside authority deciding where a soul goes or what it gets to see. It is closer to gravity. A soul naturally moves toward the experiences and environments that match where it actually is in its own growth. Compassion draws a soul toward compassionate experiences. Love draws it toward love. There is nothing arbitrary about it, and nothing punitive either. It is simply the truth of who that soul has become, expressing itself freely for what may be the first time.

Stage six: recognition of purpose

Here the soul begins to understand its own existence on a much larger scale. Individual lifetimes, the readings suggest, start to make sense not as isolated stories but as chapters in a much longer journey of growth. Things that felt random or unfair while the soul was living through them, a hardship, a loss, an unexpected turn, are understood in this stage as opportunities. Chances to learn something, to serve someone, to grow in a direction the soul needed to grow in.

I think this stage is where so much of the pain of a hard life finally gets its context. Not erased. Not excused. But placed inside a bigger picture that makes sense of it in a way it may never have made sense while it was happening. I have talked with so many people who spent their whole lives asking why something happened to them, why they had to go through what they went through. This stage suggests that the answer to that question does eventually arrive, and that it arrives with understanding rather than more suffering attached to it.

It reminds me of how differently a hard chapter of a book reads once you have finished the whole story, compared to how it read while you were still in the middle of it. In the middle, a painful chapter can feel senseless, even cruel. Looking back from the end, you can often see exactly what that chapter was setting up, what it taught the character, how it shaped everything that came after. This stage suggests the soul finally gets to read its own story that way. Not stuck inside the hardest chapter anymore, but looking back at the whole book, seeing what that chapter was actually for.

Stage seven: choosing the next step

By the final stage, the soul has healed, remembered, reunited, and understood. And here it faces a choice. Some souls, according to this teaching, choose to continue their growth through service and learning in the spiritual realms, without returning to a body at all for a while. Others choose to come back, to take on another earthly life so they can keep developing in the particular way that only physical life allows.

This choice, Cayce's readings are careful to point out, is an act of free will. It is made with guidance from advanced spiritual helpers, not imposed as a sentence or an obligation. Nobody is forced back to earth to pay off some cosmic debt. A soul returns, if it returns, because it wants to keep becoming more of who it is capable of being, the same way a person might choose to go back to school not because they are being punished but because there is more they want to learn.

Consciousness is An ongoing process, not a final stop

What I want to leave you with, after walking through all seven of these stages, is something Cayce's readings return to again and again. None of this is described as a final destination. It is a process that keeps unfolding, one that suggests consciousness itself does not end at death, and that the people we love remain connected to us in ways that do not require a body to sustain them.

There is also something in this material that I think is worth carrying into how we live right now, not just how we understand what comes after. If our spiritual condition really is shaped by the compassion, forgiveness, and love we cultivate during this life, the way these readings suggest, then every ordinary choice we make matters more than it might seem to in the moment. The patience we offer someone on a hard day. The forgiveness we choose to extend, even when it is difficult. The love we let ourselves feel and express, even when it would be easier to guard against it. None of that is separate from the soul's larger journey. It is the soul's larger journey, happening one choice at a time, right here, long before any of us reach that first stage of release.

If you are grieving someone right now, I hope these seven stages give you something steady to hold onto. Your person was not lost to confusion or fear. They were met with expanded awareness, honest and compassionate understanding of their own life, reunion with everyone who loved them, freedom they never had here, a growing sense of purpose, and a real choice about what comes next. And if you are simply thinking about your own eventual turn, I hope this offers you the same thing it has given me. Not fear of an ending, but curiosity about a continuation that has been waiting for you all along.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next.

The life review: understanding, not judgment

 The life review: understanding, not judgment

So many of us grew up with a version of the afterlife built around a courtroom. A tally of sins. A judge waiting to decide whether we measured up. Even people who left that picture behind a long time ago intellectually still sometimes feel it sitting somewhere underneath, especially in the quiet moments when they think about their own death, or worry about how a loved one's life will be weighed after they are gone.

In my research into Edgar Cayce's readings, I have found something so different from that courtroom image, and I think it is worth sharing, especially for anyone carrying quiet guilt or fear about how their life will be judged when it ends.

According to Cayce, after a soul crosses over and is welcomed by the loved ones waiting for it, higher spiritual guides step in to help it understand its new surroundings. And here is the part that matters most. Their role is not to judge. It is to help the soul see its own life clearly, through a process often called a life review.

In this review, the soul does not just remember what it did. It experiences the impact those actions had on others. A moment of kindness offered to a stranger is felt from the stranger's side too, the relief or comfort it gave them. A moment of impatience or hurt caused to someone else is felt the same way, not to shame the soul, but so it can finally understand, fully, what its life actually meant.

What I keep coming back to is that this process is described as compassionate, not cruel. There is no fire, no accusation, no eternal punishment attached to it. The purpose is growth. The soul is meant to walk away from this review with more understanding of itself, more compassion, more clarity about who it truly is underneath its mistakes.

I think about the people I have connected with, on both sides, who have carried guilt over things left unsaid or unresolved. What this teaching offers is real comfort. If the life review shows a soul the full truth of its own life, including all the love that was underneath its worst moments, then whatever regret or guilt weighed on someone here does not follow them into judgment there. It follows them into understanding instead.

That is such a different way to think about what waits for us. Not a courtroom. A mirror held with grace.

Continue reading?

You might also enjoy The Seven Stages of the Soul's Journey After Death, where I walk through the life review alongside six other stages the soul moves through, including reunion, healing, and what happens once a soul chooses its next step.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

You are never alone when you cross over

One of the questions I get asked most often, usually in a whisper, usually by someone who has just lost their person, is some version of "were they scared? Were they alone?" It is such a natural thing to wonder. We spend our whole lives trying to make sure the people we love are not alone in hard moments, and death feels like the hardest moment of all to imagine someone facing by themselves.

I have spent a good bit of time recently in Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what comes after it, and this is the piece that keeps landing hardest for me. According to that material, nobody crosses over alone. Not once. Not ever.

The moment a soul separates from the body, it is met. Not eventually, not after some period of confusion or wandering, but right there at the threshold. The ones who show up are almost always someone the soul already loved. A parent who went before them. A spouse. A childhood friend. So often, and this is the part that gets people every time, it is a pet. The dog who used to wait by the door. The cat who slept curled against their leg for fifteen years. These readings describe them all as present, waiting, ready.

What I find so moving is that the greeting is not random. According to Cayce, the soul is met first by whoever can most gently ease its fear. Whoever loved them in the simplest, safest way is who shows up to walk them through that first threshold. If a person's most uncomplicated source of comfort in life was their grandmother's kitchen, it might be their grandmother standing there. If it was the golden retriever who never once judged them, it might be that dog.

I think about how often we sit at a bedside in someone's final hours, terrified that despite our presence, despite holding their hand, they will still somehow feel alone in the moment they slip away. What this teaching offers is a different picture entirely. It says that the second the body lets go, someone who loves that person completely is already there, waiting to catch them.

If you are grieving someone right now and this fear has been sitting with you, sitting under all your other grief, I hope this gives you something to hold onto. They were not alone. They were met by love, immediately, by exactly the ones who could ease them into what comes next.

Want to go deeper?

If this resonated with you, my book They're Still Here: A Medium Shares Proof that Love Never Dies goes even further into what I've learned about the connection between this life and the next.

 

What happens when we die? Edgar Cayce's gentle vision of the soul's journey

I have spent a lot of time sitting with people in the rawest moments of their grief. The question that comes up more than any other, whether it is spoken out loud or just sitting behind someone's eyes, is some version of "where did they go?" It is the question underneath every other question. It is why people call me for readings in the first place. And it is the question I keep coming back to in my own research, because I think the answer matters more than almost anything else we can offer someone who is grieving.

Over the past several months I have been spending time with Edgar Cayce's readings on death and what comes after it. If you are not familiar with him, Cayce was an American psychic who, while in a self-induced trance state, gave thousands of readings over more than forty years on everything from health and healing to reincarnation, dreams, and the nature of the soul. People still study his work today because of how consistent and how strikingly compassionate his descriptions of the afterlife are. What struck me most, working through this material, is how far it is from the fire and judgment so many of us grew up fearing. Cayce's readings describe death not as an ending or a punishment, but as a passage. A gentle one. And the more I sit with that vision, the more I believe it is something people desperately need to hear, especially the ones I talk to who are still standing at the edge of a fresh loss, terrified for the person they lost and terrified for themselves.

So I want to walk you through what these readings actually describe, step by step, the way I understand them after this research. Not as abstract theology, but as something you can hold onto.

I also want to say, before I get into it, why this particular piece of research has stayed with me longer than most. In my work I hear a lot of fear around dying. Fear of pain, fear of judgment, fear of simply ceasing to exist. What I have noticed in reading through Cayce's material is that almost none of that fear shows up in his descriptions. There is no hell in these readings, no tribunal, no eternal punishment waiting for the imperfect. There is instead a picture of death as something the soul has already done many times before, something it knows how to do, even if the personality living inside a body in any given lifetime has forgotten. I think that distinction matters. The soul is not learning something brand new when it dies. It is remembering.

The moment of leaving the body

According to Cayce's readings, the soul does not rip away from the body in some violent, disorienting instant. It separates gently, the way you might slip out of a heavy coat you have been wearing so long you forgot it was ever removable. There is often a period, brief but real, where the soul is still aware of its connection to the body it is leaving. It may hover close for a while, taking in what is happening, before it fully releases into the spiritual realm.

What I find most comforting about this part of the teaching is what happens to awareness in that moment. The soul does not become foggy or diminished. It becomes more alive than it was in the physical body, not less. Cayce described consciousness continuing, sharpening even, once free of the limitations of flesh. The person you loved is not fading into nothing when they die. They are, according to this teaching, waking up into something clearer and freer than the life they just left.

I think about how often we say to someone in the last days of an illness, "just let go, it's okay to go." We say it because we sense, on some level, that there is nowhere frightening for them to go to. This teaching gives language to that sense. It says the letting go is not a fall into darkness. It is a release into more light, more freedom, more aliveness than we can access here.

This also lines up with something so many hospice workers and family members describe but rarely talk about openly, which is the strange lucidity that sometimes shows up right before someone dies. A person who has been confused for weeks suddenly speaks clearly. Someone reaches toward the corner of the room, or says a name out loud that nobody else recognizes. I do not think that is a coincidence, and neither, from what I can tell, did Cayce. If the soul is already beginning to loosen its grip on the body, already sensing the presence of what is waiting on the other side, that kind of moment starts to make a lot more sense. It is not the mind failing. It is the soul arriving somewhere new while the body is still catching up.

No one crosses over alone

This is the piece I share most often with clients, because it is the piece that seems to bring the fastest relief. According to Cayce's readings, nobody makes this crossing by themselves. The newly departed soul is met, almost immediately, by presences who love them.

These are often family members who died before them. A mother, a father, a spouse, a sibling. Sometimes it is a close friend. And so often, especially with the clients I work with, it is a beloved pet, the dog or cat who was there through years of ordinary life and is somehow there again at the very end of it. The readings also describe spiritual beings whose entire purpose in that moment is comfort and reassurance, guides whose job is simply to help a frightened or confused soul feel safe.

There is something specific and, I think, deeply wise about who shows up first. It is not random. The readings suggest that the first beings a soul encounters are the ones best suited to ease that particular soul's transition. Whoever can most gently dissolve that person's fear, whoever can most naturally help them release their grip on earthly life, that is who greets them. If someone was closest to their grandmother in life, it might be their grandmother waiting. If a person's fiercest, most uncomplicated love was for the dog who slept at the foot of their bed for twelve years, it might be that dog.

I tell my clients this often, because so many of them are haunted by the image of their loved one dying scared and alone, even when they were surrounded by family in a hospital room. What this teaching offers is the idea that whatever loneliness or fear the body felt in its final hours, the soul does not carry that forward. The moment it crosses, it is met. Immediately. By exactly who it needed.

The higher guides and the life review

Once that first, tender welcome has settled the soul, Cayce's readings describe higher spiritual guides stepping in to help it understand where it is and what is happening. And here is something I think is worth sitting with for a moment: these guides are not described as judges. They do not arrive to hand down a sentence or tally up sins. Their role, according to the readings, is to walk alongside the soul as it looks back on the life it just lived.

This is often called a life review, and it is one of the most detailed and, I think, one of the most beautiful parts of Cayce's teaching. The soul is shown its life again, but not the way we experience memory here, where we mostly remember our own side of things. In the life review, the soul experiences the ripple effects of what it did. A kind word offered to a stranger on a hard day. A moment of impatience with a child. The way a small act of generosity changed the course of someone else's afternoon, or year, or life. Every choice is seen not just from the soul's own vantage point but from the vantage point of everyone it touched.

What Cayce's readings are clear about is that this is not about punishment. There is no fire, no accusation, no eternal shame attached to this process. The purpose is understanding. The soul is meant to see clearly, with compassion rather than cruelty, what its life actually meant, so it can grow from what it sees. I find this such a striking contrast to the version of the afterlife so many of us absorbed as children, the one built on fear and threat. This is a version built on honesty and grace held together at once.

If you have ever worried about a loved one who passed carrying regret, guilt, or unfinished business, this part of the teaching offers something real. It suggests that whatever they did not resolve here, they are gently helped to understand and make peace with there, not condemned for it.

I think about a woman I read for a while back whose mother had died still angry with her over something that, in the end, was fairly small. She had spent months afterward terrified that her mother crossed over still carrying that anger toward her, still holding the grudge. What this teaching offers someone in that position is a different possibility. If the life review is truly about seeing a life through the eyes of everyone it touched, then her mother would have seen, clearly and without the defensiveness we carry here, exactly how much she loved her daughter underneath the argument. That kind of clarity is part of what makes the life review a mercy rather than a trial. It does not just show the soul its mistakes. It shows the soul the love that was always underneath them.

A place to heal

After the life review, the readings describe the soul entering a period of rest and restoration. This is not a quick stop. It is described as an actual realm, a peaceful space where the exhaustion, grief, and pain the soul carried from earthly life are allowed to dissolve.

I think this part gets overlooked sometimes because it is quieter than the dramatic moments of crossing over or the life review, but I think it might be the most tender part of the whole teaching. Life is hard. Even the fullest, most loved life carries wounds, disappointments, physical suffering, heartbreak. Cayce's readings suggest that none of that is meant to be carried forever. There are healing beings and guides in this realm whose role is simply to help the soul recover, the way you might finally exhale after holding your breath through something difficult for a very long time.

For someone who watched a parent suffer through a long illness, or lost a spouse to something sudden and violent, or said goodbye to a child, I think this piece of the teaching matters enormously. It says that whatever pain your loved one carried at the end, whatever suffering marked their final days, none of it followed them into what came next. It says there is a place built specifically to undo that kind of damage. To let a soul become whole again.

This is also, I think, why so many mediums, myself included, sense such a settled peace when we connect with someone who has been gone for a while, even if their passing was traumatic. The people I connect with rarely come through carrying the fear or pain of their final moments. What comes through instead is warmth, humor, love, the person as they truly are underneath everything that hurt them at the end. I used to think that was simply the nature of spirit communication. Reading Cayce's work gave me a fuller explanation for why that might be. If healing is a built in stage of the soul's journey, not an exception but a guarantee, then of course the person coming through years later feels whole. They have had time, in a very real sense, to become whole again.

Choosing what comes next

Once a soul has healed and regained its clarity, Cayce's readings describe it reaching a point where it considers what comes next. This is where the idea of reincarnation enters his work, though it is described with more nuance than the word alone suggests.

According to the readings, the soul is offered choices about how it wants to continue growing. That might mean returning to earth for another lifetime, to learn something it did not finish learning, or to be present for people it is meant to walk alongside again. Or it might mean continuing its growth in the spiritual realms themselves, through service, learning, and deeper understanding, without returning to a body at all.

What I want to be clear about, because I think it matters, is that none of this is described as an obligation or a sentence. It is not karma in the sense of punishment, where a soul is forced back to pay off some cosmic debt. Cayce's readings frame it as an act of free will, guided by wisdom rather than compulsion. The soul chooses its next step the way someone might choose the next course of study, because they want to keep growing, not because they are being made to.

I find this such a hopeful reframe of reincarnation, honestly. It is not a wheel a soul is trapped on. It is a path a soul walks because it wants to keep becoming more of who it truly is.

What this means for your own fear of dying

I would be leaving something out if I only talked about what this teaching means for the people we have already lost. So much of the fear around death is not really about the people who have gone before us. It is about our own turn. Most of us carry some version of that fear quietly, even if we do not say it out loud very often.

What I keep coming back to, the more time I spend with this material, is how thoroughly it dismantles the idea of death as a threat. There is no version of this journey, according to Cayce's readings, where a soul is left to face what comes next by itself. There is no version where a life is measured only by its worst moments. There is no version where healing is optional or where growth is forced. Every stage of this journey, from the first release from the body to the eventual return to the Divine, is built around love, not fear.

I do not say that to minimize the very real grief of leaving people and a life you love behind. That loss is real, and it deserves to be honored, not talked away. But I think there is real comfort in knowing that whatever this transition asks of us, it does not ask us to face it alone, to be judged without mercy, or to carry our wounds forever. If Cayce's readings are even partly right, dying is far less an ending to fear and far more a homecoming to trust.

The return to the Divine

Underneath every stage of this journey, from the gentle release from the body, to the welcome by loved ones, to the life review, to the healing, to the choosing, there is a single thread running through all of it according to Cayce's readings. Every experience, every lesson, every bit of guidance received along the way, is part of one long movement back toward union with the Divine.

Death, in this teaching, is not the opposite of life. It is not an ending at all. It is a return. The whole of a soul's journey, the earthly life it just completed and everything that follows after, is understood as steps home. And love is described as the force that holds that entire journey together, from the first moment of crossing to the last.

I think this is the piece I want to leave you with most of all. If you are grieving someone right now, if you lie awake wondering whether they are okay, whether they are scared, whether they are alone, I hope what you take from this research is a simple, steady reassurance. According to these readings, they were met the instant they crossed. They were held with understanding, not judgment, as they looked back on their life. They were given rest for whatever they were carrying. And they remain, even now, on a path that leads home.

No soul, according to this teaching, is ever truly alone. And I do not believe that ends with the ones who have already crossed. I believe it includes the ones of us still here, missing them, waiting for our own turn to understand what they now already know.

Ready to experience a reading?

If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to walk that path with you. You can book a mediumship reading at aperfectsoul.com.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

Common Myths About Mediumship, Debunked

Over the years, I've heard just about every misconception a person could have about mediumship, usually from someone sitting nervously across from me right before their very first reading. I don't blame anyone for believing these things. Movies, television, and a handful of bad experiences with less careful practitioners have shaped a lot of assumptions that simply don't match what this work actually looks like. (I used to believe in bad "ghosts" before learning mediumship!)

One of the most common myths is that a medium can summon anyone on command, as if death is a phone directory and I can just look up whoever you'd like to speak with. That isn't how it works, at least not in my experience. I don't control who comes through or when. I can invite communication, but I can't force a specific person to appear simply because that's who the sitter was hoping for.

Another myth I hear often is that a good medium should be able to answer any question instantly, with total certainty, the moment it's asked. Real communication with spirit doesn't function like a search engine. It unfolds more like a conversation, sometimes circling around a subject before arriving at it directly, sometimes leaving certain questions unanswered entirely for reasons that only become clear later, if they become clear at all.

People also frequently believe that mediumship is inherently dark or dangerous, something that opens a door best left closed. I understand where that fear comes from, but nothing in my own experience supports it. What consistently comes through in readings is love, reassurance, and connection, not anything sinister. The work has always felt, to me, like an extension of compassion rather than something to fear.

There's also a common assumption that mediums can read minds or know everything about a person's life without any information being shared. That isn't accurate either. What I receive comes from spirit, not from scanning a person's private thoughts, and a responsible medium should never claim otherwise.

Finally, I often meet people who believe that if a reading doesn't feel dramatic or overwhelming, it must not have been real. I'd gently push back on that one most of all. Some of the most meaningful readings I've ever witnessed were quiet, almost understated, built around small, ordinary details that meant everything to the person receiving them. Real connection rarely needs theatrics to be genuine.

If you've been holding back from booking a reading because of one of these misconceptions, I hope this helps put your mind a little more at ease. Mediumship, at its best, isn't about spectacle. It's about honest, careful communication between people who love each other, even when one of them is no longer here in a body we can see.

---

Many Readers continue Here

Continue Reading? You might also enjoy What I Wish Everyone Knew About Mediumship Before Booking Their First Reading, where I share more about what actually matters most before you sit down for your own session.

Ready to Experience a Reading? If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to work with you.

Book a mediumship reading at www.aperfectsoul.com

Browse More Articles Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.

 

How to Prepare for Your First Mediumship Reading

People often ask me what they should do beforehand to get ready for their first reading, as if there's a checklist that will guarantee a better outcome. I understand the instinct. When you've waited a long time for this, and it means so much, it's natural to want to do everything right. The truth is, the preparation that matters most has very little to do with logistics and everything to do with your own state of mind.

The most useful thing you can do is simply come with an open heart rather than a fixed agenda. I know that's easier said than done, especially if you've spent months hoping to hear something very specific. But readings tend to unfold most naturally when a person isn't gripping tightly to one particular outcome. That doesn't mean your hopes don't matter. It means holding them a little more loosely, so you can actually receive what comes rather than measuring everything against what you expected to hear.

You don't need to bring a long list of questions, although it's fine if you want to. What matters more is being ready to simply say yes or no honestly when I share something, rather than working hard to make a piece of evidence fit. The clearest, most meaningful readings happen when a sitter trusts their own immediate reaction instead of trying to force a connection.

It also helps to get a decent night's sleep beforehand if you can, and to avoid rushing into the reading straight from something stressful. You don't need to meditate for an hour or prepare in any elaborate spiritual sense. You simply want to arrive as calm and present as your circumstances allow, so you can actually notice and absorb what's happening instead of being distracted by everything else going on in your day.

I'd also gently encourage you to release any pressure to cry, or not cry, or to have a particular kind of emotional experience. Grief doesn't follow a script, and neither does healing. Some people leave a reading feeling deeply emotional. Others leave feeling strangely light and calm. Neither reaction is more correct than the other.

Above all, I'd say come as yourself. You don't need to be especially spiritual, and you don't need any prior experience with mediumship to have a meaningful reading. What matters most is your willingness to be present, honest, and open to whatever your loved one wants to share, even if it isn't exactly what you were expecting to hear.

---

More to Explore

Continue Reading? You might also like What Actually Happens During a Mediumship Reading, where I walk through exactly what to expect once the session begins.

Ready to Experience a Reading? If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to work with you.

Book a mediumship reading at www.aperfectsoul.com

Browse More Articles Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.

What I Wish Everyone Knew About Mediumship Before Booking Their First Reading

 What I Wish Everyone Knew About Mediumship Before Booking Their First Reading

There are certain conversations I've had so many times that I can almost predict how they'll start. Someone will call or email saying they're thinking about booking a reading, but before they do, they have a few questions. Sometimes those questions are practical, how long the reading lasts, whether they should bring a list of things to ask. More often, though, the questions come from uncertainty, because they're trying to decide whether mediumship is something they can trust.

I understand that hesitation completely.

If you've never had a reading before, you're being asked to step into something you can't really compare to anything else. Maybe you've seen television programs where mediums seem to know everything instantly, or maybe you've read stories online that left you wondering whether mediumship is real or just wishful thinking. Somewhere between those two extremes are people who quietly hope there's something to it, but are afraid of being disappointed.

I've met all of those people.

Some arrive convinced mediumship can't possibly be real and leave with questions they never expected to ask. Others come hoping for an experience that will erase every ounce of grief they carry, only to discover that healing rarely happens in a single afternoon. Then there are people who walk in with an open mind, no expectations, willing to just see what unfolds. Interestingly, they're often the ones who settle into the experience most naturally, because they're not trying to force it into something it was never meant to be.

When someone asks what they should know before their first reading, I rarely start by talking about mediumship itself. Instead, I ask them to think about the person they're hoping to hear from and the relationship they shared. Because in my experience, mediumship was never about collecting impressive pieces of information. At its heart, it's about reconnecting with someone whose life mattered deeply to you.

That might sound like a small distinction, but I think it changes everything.

When people approach a reading like it's a test they need to pass, they often get so focused on evaluating every sentence that they miss the experience happening right in front of them. I understand why. We all want reassurance that the person coming through is genuinely the one we love. Evidence matters, and it should. Evidential mediumship is built on recognition, because without recognition, there's no meaningful communication.

At the same time, recognition doesn't always show up the dramatic way people expect.

I remember a gentleman who spent the first twenty minutes of his reading quietly nodding as piece after piece of evidence came through. His father's job, his unusual hobby, the way he always whistled while working around the house, even the old pickup truck he refused to replace no matter how much everyone nagged him. Every detail landed, and yet his expression stayed thoughtful rather than emotional.

Near the end, his father brought up something so ordinary another person might have dismissed it completely. Every Sunday morning, he'd wake before the rest of the family, make himself a cup of coffee, and sit by the kitchen window reading the newspaper before anyone else came downstairs. He'd always fold one particular section and leave it on the table, because he knew his son liked to read it first.

The gentleman looked at me for several seconds before his eyes filled with tears.

He smiled and quietly said, "Nobody knew he did that except me."

Of everything that came through during that reading, it wasn't the career, the truck, or the hobby that touched him most.

It was a simple memory.

The kind that lives inside a relationship.

That experience reminded me, once again, that mediumship isn't measured by how spectacular the information sounds. More often it's the ordinary moments that become extraordinary, because they're woven into the fabric of a life two people shared. Those details can't be found on social media, in an obituary, or through careful guesswork. They belong to a relationship, and that's exactly why they carry so much weight.

One misconception I'd love to see disappear is the idea that a successful reading has to answer every question a client has ever had. That would certainly make people happy, but it hasn't been my experience after years of doing this work. Spirit communication unfolds much like any meaningful conversation. Some subjects get explored in depth. Others are touched on briefly, and occasionally a question that seemed vitally important beforehand becomes much less significant, because the reading has already given something more valuable.

I've watched that happen many times.

Someone arrives carrying years of uncertainty, and leaves saying, "I didn't get every answer I thought I needed, but somehow I feel at peace."

That's a fascinating thing to hear, because peace doesn't always come from knowing more.

Sometimes it comes from feeling connected again.

One of the things mediumship has taught me over the years has very little to do with communicating with spirit and everything to do with understanding people. Before I ever sit down for a reading, I know the person across from me isn't bringing a list of questions out of curiosity. Those questions represent a relationship. Birthdays that will never be celebrated the same way again. Conversations that ended too soon. Ordinary moments that have become priceless because they can never happen again.

I never lose sight of that.

It's part of why I take such care explaining what a reading is actually meant to be. I don't want someone walking through my door believing they're about to watch a performance or something out of a television program. My hope is that they understand they're about to take part in something far more personal. They're giving themselves permission, maybe for the first time in a long while, to reconnect with someone whose absence has left an enormous space in their life.

Because of that, I don't measure a reading by how much evidence comes through or how dramatic it looks to someone watching from outside. What matters to me is whether the person in front of me recognizes the loved one who's communicating. Recognition changes everything. Once someone hears a familiar expression only their father ever used, or a family memory no stranger could know, something starts to soften. The conversation stops being about proving survival after death. It becomes a reunion, however brief, with someone whose presence still matters deeply.

I remember a woman who apologized before we'd even begun, because she was convinced she'd spend the whole reading crying. She told me she was embarrassed by how emotional she'd become since losing her mother and worried she wouldn't be able to focus. I told her there was nothing she needed to do except be herself, because grief has never followed a script, and neither do readings.

As the communication unfolded, her mother didn't open with profound messages about the afterlife. She talked about baking together every Christmas, gently laughed about her daughter's habit of ignoring recipes, and brought through little memories that could only belong to the two of them. Watching my client, I noticed something remarkable. The tears she'd expected never fully went away, but they quietly gave way to laughter. For a few precious moments she wasn't thinking about the hospital room or the funeral. She was remembering what it felt like to be her mother's daughter again.

That experience has stayed with me because it shows something I see over and over. Grief has a way of narrowing our focus until the final days of someone's life overshadow everything that came before them. A meaningful reading gently widens that view again. It reminds us a lifetime can't be defined by its ending. The relationship was built through thousands of ordinary moments that probably didn't seem especially important at the time. Looking back, those are often the memories we treasure most, because they remind us of the life we shared, not just the loss we endured.

Maybe that's why the most meaningful evidence is so often the simplest. Not necessarily the information that would impress a room full of strangers. It's the tiny detail that brings a smile to one person's face because they recognize the heart behind it. Those quiet moments have convinced me that love has always lived in the ordinary. We just don't realize how extraordinary ordinary moments are until we can't make new ones anymore.

Looking back over the years I've been doing this work, the most meaningful readings I remember aren't the ones people left talking about astonishing evidence. That certainly has its place, and it can be incredibly validating. The readings that stay with me most are the ones where I watched someone's shoulders relax for the first time in months, or a genuine smile slowly replace the sadness they'd carried into the room.

Those are the moments that remind me why I became a medium in the first place.

People sometimes assume mediumship is about proving life after death. Evidence is an essential part of every reading, but I've come to believe it serves a bigger purpose. Evidence helps us recognize who's communicating, but recognition is only the beginning. Once that connection is established, something more important gets to unfold. The conversation stops being about proving someone still exists and becomes a reminder that love hasn't disappeared just because we can no longer see the person we miss.

That shift might seem subtle, but I've watched it transform people.

I remember a gentleman who reached out several weeks after his reading, wanting to share something that had surprised him. During the session, he'd been completely focused on getting evidence that his wife was still with him. Looking back, that wasn't what stayed with him at all. What stayed was how he felt after leaving. For the first time since her death, he found himself talking about her with his children without feeling overwhelmed by sadness. They spent the whole evening trading stories that hadn't been told since before the funeral, and somewhere in there he realized they'd laughed together more than they'd cried.

He said something I'll never forget.

"I came hoping to hear from my wife," he told me. "What I didn't expect was to find a little more of myself."

His words have stayed with me because they describe what healing often looks like better than anything I could have said myself. It rarely arrives all at once, and it almost never announces itself. It quietly starts changing how we carry our grief. We don't stop missing the people we love. We just discover their memory no longer belongs only to loss. It starts making room for gratitude, joy, and the countless ordinary moments that made the relationship so precious in the first place.

If you're thinking about booking your first reading, I hope you'll let yourself arrive with an open mind instead of a long list of expectations. Bring your questions, because they're part of your journey. Bring your memories, because they're part of your story. Most of all, bring your heart exactly as it is. You don't have to be especially spiritual. You don't need to know the "right" way to participate, and you definitely don't have to worry about saying or doing the wrong thing.

Just come as yourself.

I've found that being genuine creates far more meaningful connections than trying to have the perfect reading ever could.

If you decide a reading isn't the right step for you right now, that's completely okay too. There are many paths through grief, and no single one is right for everyone. My hope has never been to convince people they need a reading. It's to give honest information so people can make the decision that feels right for them.

That same intention is what led me to write my book, They're Still Here: A Medium Shares the Proof That Love Never Dies. Over the years I realized that many of the questions people asked before and after a reading were the same questions being asked by countless others who might never schedule an appointment with a medium. I wanted to create something that would answer those questions thoughtfully, explain how evidential mediumship actually works, share true stories that have deeply touched my own life, and, above all, reassure grieving people that they're not alone in what they're experiencing.

Whether you eventually choose to have a reading, read the book, or just keep exploring these articles at your own pace, I hope you've come away with one understanding that matters more than anything else I've shared.

The relationship you had with the person you love did not end the day they died.

It changed.

The conversations may be different now. The way you remember them may keep evolving. The grief you're carrying today won't always feel exactly like this. But the love that shaped your relationship keeps leaving its imprint on your life every single day, often so quietly and naturally that we don't notice until we stop long enough to reflect.

If these articles have helped you do that, then they've served the purpose I hoped they would. They've opened a conversation about grief, healing, and mediumship grounded in compassion rather than fear, curiosity rather than certainty, and hope rather than unrealistic promises.

Thank you for spending this time with me. It's been a privilege to walk beside you for a little while, and I sincerely hope that wherever you are on your journey, you keep moving forward knowing love has a remarkable way of remaining present in our lives, even after death has changed how we experience it.

Want more like this in your inbox? Get one story a week on grief, mediumship, and what I've learned from years of sitting with people who are healing, straight from my writing here on the blog. Join the list ➞

 

Why the Best Evidence Isn't Always the Most Dramatic

I once worked with a woman who had come hoping to hear from her father, a man who'd built and sold small businesses his whole life, sharp, successful, larger than life in almost every way. What came through instead, near the end of the reading, wasn't anything about his career or his accomplishments. It was a memory of him standing at the stove on Saturday mornings, badly burning scrambled eggs and insisting, every single time, that they were "just how he liked them."

She started laughing before she could stop herself. Then she started crying. That small, slightly ridiculous memory meant more to her than any of the more impressive details that had come through earlier in the reading, details about his business, his awards, the things most people would think to mention if they were trying to prove who he was.

I've seen this happen more times than I can count. People often arrive expecting evidence to sound impressive, something specific and dramatic enough to leave no room for doubt. And sometimes it does look like that. But just as often, the detail that lands hardest is something almost embarrassingly small. A phrase only they used. A ridiculous nickname. A habit no one else in the family would have thought to mention because it never seemed important enough to bring up.

I think that makes perfect sense once you think about it. The big, impressive facts about a person, their job, their achievements, their public reputation, are often things a stranger could learn without ever having known them personally. But burned eggs on a Saturday morning, said with total sincerity for thirty years? That belongs only to the people who lived inside that relationship. Nobody could guess it. Nobody could fake it. It could only come from someone who was actually there.

That's part of why I've stopped measuring the strength of a reading by how dramatic it sounds. The evidence that means the most isn't usually the evidence that would impress an outside observer. It's the evidence that makes the person across from me stop breathing for a second, because they instantly know, without a doubt, that only one person in the world could have said that.

If you're preparing for your own reading, I'd encourage you to let go of any expectation that the proof needs to sound remarkable to be real. Sometimes the smallest, silliest detail is the loudest confirmation of all, because it could only ever have come from someone who truly knew you, and whom you truly knew in return.

---

Continue the Conversation

Continue Reading? You might also enjoy Why a Medium Doesn't Tell You Everything You Want to Hear, where I talk more about how evidence unfolds during a reading, and why it doesn't always arrive the way we expect.

Ready to Experience a Reading? If you're feeling drawn to connect with a loved one in spirit, I'd be honored to work with you.

Book a mediumship reading at www.aperfectsoul.com

Browse More Articles Explore more articles about mediumship, signs from loved ones, grief, dreams, and the afterlife on the blog.